Rotations in Quantum Mechanics Question

AdamBourke
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement





This is more maths than QM I think, but it's at the beginning of my Quantum Questions. Basically, it's about rotations preserving length:

xi is the ith component of a vector, and the length of a vector is determined by the metric ηij according to the equation:

l2 = ηij xixj

where Einstein Summation Convention is used

The action of a geometrical transformation R acting on the vectors can be written:

x' i = R ij x j


Show that R is an isometry (i.e distances are preserved by rotations) if and only if:

R Tη R = η




Homework Equations



None, other than the ones in the question. Unless I'm wrong, which would explain why I can't do the question...

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, I'm not entirely sure where to begin.

I started with the condition:

l2 = ηij xixj = (R Tηij R) R ia x aR jb x b


But then I wasn't really sure a) if the ηij should be encased by the Rs, and b) what do do after that. I tried to write (R Tηij R) as RpiηpqRjq, but that gives an awful lot of Rs and indices which I just can't see how to get rid of:

ηij xixj = RpiηpqRjq R ia x aR jb x b


Am I looking at this completely wrong, or just not seeing something simple? It's an assignment, so I don't want the answer, but I need some help I think.

Thanks,
Adam
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If distances are preserved, then the length of {x'}^i = {R^i}_j x^j must be equal to the length of x^i. So it must be that

\eta_{ij}{x'}^i{x'}^j = \eta_{ij}x^i x^j.

You therefore want to determine the condition on {R^i}_j so that this is true.

The approach you took would have worked too, but you would have had to be much more careful about all of the indices in the expression, as well as knowing a property of the inverse of the matrix R.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top