Rules governing the creation of complex waveforms through addition of sine waves

AI Thread Summary
Synthesizing complex waveforms using sine waves involves understanding the interactions between multiple frequencies, particularly when they are non-integer and not closely spaced. While amplitude modulation occurs predictably with two slightly detuned sine waves, adding a third wave complicates the prediction of the resultant amplitude envelope. The challenge lies in determining the complex interactions that arise when combining multiple sine waves, especially when their frequencies differ significantly. There is a need for simplifying relationships or rules that can help predict the characteristics of such waveforms, particularly in cases involving more than two frequencies. The discussion highlights the quest for analytical expressions to describe these complex behaviors in sound synthesis.
max_planck735
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I'm interested in synthesizing complex waveforms using sine waves.

I know that when two sine waves which differ slightly in frequency from one another are summed, amplitude modulation (AKA "beating") with a frequency equal to the difference in frequency between the two sine waves ensues. This relationship is very useful to know for an aspiring sound designer such as myself.

I also know that "stable" waveforms can be synthesized from a root frequency sine wave, with whole number harmonics added to it.

The area where I find myself wishing I knew some useful simplifying relationships is where one adds more than two sine waves of non-integer frequency values. For example, I would have no idea how to predict any characteristics of waveform resulting from the summing of three sine waves, of respective frequencies: 130.813, 131.089 and 131.366 Hz. I could of course simply graph the result and look at it, but I can't do this if I am trying to synthesize a complex waveform which I have imagined, whose component sine wave frequencies and phases I do not know.

I'm wondering, are there any other useful simplifying relationships that anyone can run past me?


One particular issue that is stumping me is as follows: when two sine waves, slightly detuned from one another, are added together, the "beating" behavior and frequency of the resultant waveform is easily predictable, by the simple rule described above. However, when a THIRD sine wave, of a frequency close but not equal to the frequency of the other two sine waves is added to the sum of these other two sine waves, I don't know how to predict the amplitude envelope shape/position of the resultant waveform. I've tried looking at wave1+wave2, and wave1+wave3, and wave2+wave3 in hopes of being able to deduce some sort of simple relationship between their easily predictable amplitude evelopes (i.e. "beat" frequencies) and the amplitude envelope of wave1+wave2+wave3, to no avail. It seems that the amplitude envelope of wave1+wave2+wave3 is determined by some complex interaction of waves 1, 2 and 3 that's result I don't know how to predict.

I could of course simply add wave1+wave2+wave3 and look at the resultant waveform, but I am trying to find a more simple way, if such a way exists, to predict what the amplitude envelope of wave1+wave2+wave3 will be.


If there does not exist any simple rule by which to do this, are there any valid rules/relationships that would at least aid in accomplishing the aforementioned task, perhaps by bounding the range of possible sine waves needed to construct a given waveform, or something along these or other lines?


Another type of behavior that I'm trying to understand has to do with a complex waveform that was synthesized using 16 sine oscillators of varying frequency and phase. The perceived pitch of this waveform actually decreases in one region of the waveform... I'm wondering if there are any simplifying rules/relationships which I can use to predict when a certain combination of sine waves will produce such behavior.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
max_planck735 said:
I'm interested in synthesizing complex waveforms using sine waves.

I know that when two sine waves which differ slightly in frequency from one another are summed, amplitude modulation (AKA "beating") with a frequency equal to the difference in frequency between the two sine waves ensues. This relationship is very useful to know for an aspiring sound designer such as myself.

I also know that "stable" waveforms can be synthesized from a root frequency sine wave, with whole number harmonics added to it.

The area where I find myself wishing I knew some useful simplifying relationships is where one adds more than two sine waves of non-integer frequency values. For example, I would have no idea how to predict any characteristics of waveform resulting from the summing of three sine waves, of respective frequencies: 130.813, 131.089 and 131.366 Hz. I could of course simply graph the result and look at it, but I can't do this if I am trying to synthesize a complex waveform which I have imagined, whose component sine wave frequencies and phases I do not know.

I'm wondering, are there any other useful simplifying relationships that anyone can run past me?


One particular issue that is stumping me is as follows: when two sine waves, slightly detuned from one another, are added together, the "beating" behavior and frequency of the resultant waveform is easily predictable, by the simple rule described above. However, when a THIRD sine wave, of a frequency close but not equal to the frequency of the other two sine waves is added to the sum of these other two sine waves, I don't know how to predict the amplitude envelope shape/position of the resultant waveform. I've tried looking at wave1+wave2, and wave1+wave3, and wave2+wave3 in hopes of being able to deduce some sort of simple relationship between their easily predictable amplitude evelopes (i.e. "beat" frequencies) and the amplitude envelope of wave1+wave2+wave3, to no avail. It seems that the amplitude envelope of wave1+wave2+wave3 is determined by some complex interaction of waves 1, 2 and 3 that's result I don't know how to predict.

I could of course simply add wave1+wave2+wave3 and look at the resultant waveform, but I am trying to find a more simple way, if such a way exists, to predict what the amplitude envelope of wave1+wave2+wave3 will be.


If there does not exist any simple rule by which to do this, are there any valid rules/relationships that would at least aid in accomplishing the aforementioned task, perhaps by bounding the range of possible sine waves needed to construct a given waveform, or something along these or other lines?


Another type of behavior that I'm trying to understand has to do with a complex waveform that was synthesized using 16 sine oscillators of varying frequency and phase. The perceived pitch of this waveform actually decreases in one region of the waveform... I'm wondering if there are any simplifying rules/relationships which I can use to predict when a certain combination of sine waves will produce such behavior.

Amplitude modulation is the result of the multiplication and not of the sum of two sinusoids.
 
hi max_planck735,

I'm interested in a similar problem. Did you ever find a solution to it? Actually, I was looking for an analytic expression to describe the periodic variations that occur when two frequencies are added together, but where the frequencies are not close and are rational fractions of each other. The standard beat frequency is no longer relevant in this case.

Thanks
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top