Runge-Kutta vs Euler: Solving Two-Dimensional Differential Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter mrsvan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Euler Runge-kutta
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a two-dimensional differential equation, specifically dx/dt = (-y, x), which describes circular motion. The user initially finds the simple Euler method to be more precise than the fourth-order Runge-Kutta method, leading to frustration and confusion after debugging their code for two days. They question whether there are scenarios where Runge-Kutta performs worse than Euler or if their implementation contains an error. Ultimately, the user discovers a mistake related to an extra time increment in their code, resolving the issue. This highlights the importance of careful coding and debugging in numerical methods.
mrsvan
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi, I don't know if this is the right forum to adress, but I will try nevertheless
Im solving a simple two-dimensional differential equation:

dx/dt = (-y,x)

which will give a circle when integrating over time.

Now, the problem is that the simple euler scheme seems to be a lot more precise than the runge-kutta fourth order method. I've spend two whole days trying to debug my code and I feel stuck. so, are there some special cases where rk is worse than euler -- or is there no other explanation than I have made a mistake somewhere (it's four lines of code and my supervisors have had a look without the error popping up.)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
great monday... just after complaining in here i found that I've messed an extra time-increment in somewhere in the code :p sorry for the inconvenience
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top