Runner A & B Paths Cross: Displacement of B from Flagpole

  • Thread starter Thread starter AdnamaLeigh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cross Displacement
AdnamaLeigh
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Runner A is initially 4.54 mi West of a flagpole and is running with a constant velocity of 7.06 mi/h due East. Runner B is initially 4.34 mi East of the flagpole and is running with a constant velocity of 6.82 mi/h due West. Consider East to be in the positive direction. What is the displacement of runner B from the flagpole when their paths cross? Answer in units of mi.

Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Please show how you started, and where you got stuck.
 
I figured out that it will take A .643hr to reach the flagpole but B .636hr so I know that when the two cross, it's going to be on the left side of the pole, with negative displacement. At .636hrs, A will be 0.05mi away from the pole so they should cross soon. That's where I'm stuck; I think I'm making this too confusing.
 
You should try to write down the displacement of each runner as a function of time, like this:

x(t)=vt+x_0,

where x(t) is the displacement, v is the velocity, t is the time, and x_0 is the initial displacement. To find out when the runners meet, simply equate the two functions and solve for time.
 
What is the initial distance between the two runners?
What is their relative velocity?
Dividing the distance by the velocity you find the time they take to cross each other.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top