Running 3 Miles: The Staggering Implications

  • Thread starter Thread starter Namloh2000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frames
AI Thread Summary
Running 3 miles raises questions about motion and infinity, particularly through Zeno's Paradox, which suggests that one must reach an infinite number of halfway points. Despite this paradox, individuals can complete the distance because the sum of an infinite series, like the distances covered in each segment, remains finite. Each segment takes progressively less time, allowing for a finite completion of the run. The discussion highlights the tension between mathematical theory and practical experience in motion. Understanding these concepts can lead to deeper insights into the nature of distance and time.
Namloh2000
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Moving in Frames??

okay, so let's say I ran 3 miles. At one point, I must have been halfway between start and finish right? From the halfway point, I must have existed halfway from there and the remaining 1.5 miles also. And halfway between THAT point and the finish. Then halfway from THAT point and the finish. I must have existed at all these halfway points, but if motion was fluid, couldn't this not be accomplished, being that I can divide my new remaining distance in half from here to infinity, meaning that I would have to be running forever? The implications are staggering!

seriously though, what's up - how come I can run 3 miles?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is known as Zeno's Paradox. The sum of an infinite series is still finite. Google it. Much has been said about it.
 
okay so i read up a bit and the solution seems to be something in that because the sum of the series ½ + ¼ + 1/8 + ... is equal to 1. The total time is finite because each step is done in half as much time as the previous step.

But I still don't understand.
 
OK, I see that you don't have much faith in mathematics. Anyway, go visit here if you are interested: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=22419

You can open a new thread in the General Math section if you still don't believe in Zeno's Paradox. You will get more replies there, and most of them will be harsh. So good luck! :)
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top