SAT Question concerning Newton's Third Law

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the interpretation of Newton's Third Law regarding forces experienced by a person standing on a floor. One viewpoint asserts that the downward gravitational force and the upward support force from the floor are equal in magnitude and form an action/reaction pair. However, the book argues that these forces do not constitute an action/reaction pair because they act on the same object, which is a misunderstanding of Newton's laws. The correct interpretation is that action/reaction pairs involve forces acting on different objects, while the forces in question represent equilibrium in a single object. Clarifying the terminology around "reaction force" helps to differentiate between the forces involved in this scenario.
yellowenigma
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I didn't understand the explanation, and think perhaps the book is wrong.

A person is standing on a horizontal floor fells two forces: the downward pull of gravity and the upward supporting force from the floor. These two forces are:

I put A) have equal magnitudes and form an action/reaction pair.

according to the book, they B) have equal mags and do not form an action/reaction pair.

The book explains that b/c the two forces are felt by the same object (the person), it cannot be an action/reaction pair, but doesn't the push of the person lead to the reaction of the push on the person from the earth?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yellowenigma said:
I didn't understand the explanation, and think perhaps the book is wrong.

A person is standing on a horizontal floor fells two forces: the downward pull of gravity and the upward supporting force from the floor. These two forces are:

I put A) have equal magnitudes and form an action/reaction pair.

according to the book, they B) have equal mags and do not form an action/reaction pair.

The book explains that b/c the two forces are felt by the same object (the person), it cannot be an action/reaction pair, but doesn't the push of the person lead to the reaction of the push on the person from the earth?
Yes, but action-reaction pairs, per Newton 3, refer to forces acting on different objects. What you have described is the equilibrium of forces acting on the same object, which is Newton 1. The upward force of the floor on the person is not the same as the person's weight in the general case of accelerating bodies (that's Newton 2), you know, like if you're in an elevator accelerating up, the floor force on you is greater than than your weight, per Newton 2, but the force of you on the floor is always the same in magnitude as the force of the floor on you, per Newton 3.
 
Last edited:
yellowenigma said:
... but doesn't the push of the person lead to the reaction of the push on the person from the earth?

There is an unfortunate double-use of the term "reaction force." As the gravitational force on the person pulls him down, the floor "gets in the way." As the two surfaces get close to each other, they begin to repel with a mutual electostatic force. The surface of the person's feet repels the surface of the floor and vice versa. These two forces are action/reaction pairs.

Whenever you find a reaction pair, all you need to do is switch the places of the nouns.
action: person pulled by earth
reaction: Earth pulled by person
action: foot repels floor
reaction: floor repels foot
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
894
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
14K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Back
Top