Satellite in orbit losing speed

AI Thread Summary
A satellite in a stationary orbit loses 10% of its kinetic energy after passing through a cloud, prompting a recalculation of its new orbital radius. Initial calculations indicated a radius of 35,904 km, but after accounting for the energy loss, a new radius of 46,996 km was derived. However, it was noted that objects in higher orbits have lower speeds, leading to a misunderstanding of the relationship between kinetic energy and gravitational potential energy. The discussion emphasized the importance of using a conservation of energy approach, combining both kinetic and potential energy in calculations. Clarifications on units and the distinction between radius and height above Earth were also highlighted as necessary for accurate results.
Karol
Messages
1,380
Reaction score
22

Homework Statement


A satellite is put into a stationary orbit around earth, i.e. it stays above one point, then it passes through a cloud and looses 10% of it's kinetic energy. it is stabilized again in a new orbit, what's the new radius.

Homework Equations


Attraction force: ##F=\frac{GMm}{R^2}##
Acceleration: ##a=\frac{V^2}{R}##
Relation of speed with period: ##2\pi R=V\cdot T##

The Attempt at a Solution


Finding the initial speed by finding the initial radius:
The initial period is 24 hours, the period is ##24\cdot 3600=86,400##
$$\frac{GMm}{R^2}=\frac{V^2}{R}=\frac{4\pi^2 R^2}{T^2}$$
$$R^3=\frac{6.67E-11\cdot 6E24\cdot 86,400^2}{4\pi^2}\rightarrow R=35,904 km$$
The initial speed is:
$$S=VT\rightarrow 42,303,864=V\cdot 86,400\rightarrow V=3076$$
The initial kinetic energy:
$$\frac{1}{2}m\cdot 3076^2=4,257,799$$
The final velocity after deducing 10%:
$$4,257,799\cdot 0.9 \cdot m=\frac{1}{2}m\cdot V^2\rightarrow V^2=8,515,598$$
$$R=\frac{GM}{V^2}=\frac{6.67E-11\cdot 6E24}{8,515,598}=46,996 km$$
It should be R=40,500 km
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Objects in higher orbits have lower orbital speeds. That's why you found a larger radius for your 10% loss in speed; you didn't account for the fact that to get there you'd have to add gravitational potential energy to reach that orbit.

Have you considered using a conservation of energy approach? There's both KE and PE to deal with.
 
I wanted to delete the thread since i was asked the height above Earth and i forgot to extract the Earth's radius from what i got, so my result is correct
 
It would help clarify your calculations if you would indicate units consistently, not every now and then.
 
Karol said:
I wanted to delete the thread since i was asked the height above Earth and i forgot to extract the Earth's radius from what i got, so my result is correct
Maybe, but gneill is correct that the calculation you posted was wrong. You should take the total energy, PE+KE, subtract 10% of the KE from that, and figure out the radius for the new total.
The question as posted asks for the new radius, not the height above the earth. This suggests that your revised answer, by subtracting Earth's radius, was approximately correct numerically by sheer luck.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top