A Scalar Fields with the Same Mass

hilbert2
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,600
Reaction score
607
In the Peskin&Schröder's QFT book there's an exercise that's about a pair of scalar fields, ##\phi_1## and ##\phi_2##, having the field equations

##\left(\partial^{\mu}\partial_{\mu}+m^2 \right)\phi_1 = 0##
##\left(\partial^{\mu}\partial_{\mu}+m^2 \right)\phi_2 = 0##

where the mass parameter is the same for both fields. Now I can make a "rotation",

##\phi_{1}^{'} = \cos \alpha \phi_1 - \sin \alpha \phi_2##
##\phi_{2}^{'} = \cos \alpha \phi_2 + \sin \alpha \phi_1##

which mixes the two fields. The generator of this rotation apparently has properties of angular momentum, but has nothing to do with spacetime. The symmetry can also remain if a four-point interaction is added in the form of terms proportional to ##(\phi_1)^4##, ##(\phi_2)^4## and ##\phi_1^2 \phi_2^2## in the Lagrangian density.

From other sources I got the impression that this has something to do with the Higgs mechanism... How does this extend to more than 2 scalar fields, and can a pair of vector, tensor or spinor fields have a similar property? If the fields have almost the same mass, is there some useful way to treat the mass difference as some kind of a perturbation?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This is just a scalar field theory with an SU(N) internal symmetry. The field can be represented as a vector. If the symmetry is promoted to a local symmetry it will become a nonabelian gauge theory coupled to a scalar field.

You can also have this for spinor fields
 
  • Like
Likes hilbert2
Thanks. I'll still need to read more about this to understand the case where the symmetry is only approximate.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top