Scalars, vectors, pseudo-scalars, pseudo-vectors

  • Thread starter Thread starter captain
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Scalars Vectors
AI Thread Summary
Scalars and pseudo-scalars do not change sign under parity, while vectors and pseudo-vectors do. This distinction does not necessarily imply that scalars must be even functions or pseudo-scalars must be odd functions of their coordinates. Functions can often be decomposed into even and odd parts, but this does not mean that scalars and pseudo-scalars can be mixed in a single function. In physics, each type—scalar, vector, pseudo-scalar, and pseudo-vector—must remain distinct and cannot be combined. Understanding these classifications is crucial for proper application in physics.
captain
Messages
163
Reaction score
0
This is a basic question about the scalars, vectors, pseudo-scalars, and pseudo-vectors. I know that scalars and pseudo-vectors don't change sign under parity and vectors and pseudo-scalars do, but does that imply that scalars have to be even function of x, y, z (like for example x^2+y^4+z^2) and pseudo scalars have to be odd in x, y, z and also correspondingly with vectors and pseudo vectors? Also if you have a function like x^3 +y^2+z^54, does that mean that this function can be broken up into a scalar and pseudo scalar part, just like how any function can be broken up into an even and an odd part? I think I am really confused about this. Thanks in advance to anyone who can really clarify this. (Also I didn't know where to post this question. So if its placed in the wrong section, then feel free to redirect it into the correct section.)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi captain! :smile:

Just as you can't add scalars to vectors,

you can't add vectors to pseudovectors, or scalars to pseudoscalars.

In physics, it'll be a scalar or a vector or a pseudo-scalar or a pseudo-vector …

it won't be a mixture. :smile:
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top