Scattering angle in relativistic kinematics

kalok87
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Considering 2 scattering particles with momenta ##p_{1}, p_{2}##, where ##p_{2} = 0## in the Lab reference. The momenta of these 2 particles after elastic collision are ##p_{1}', p_{2}'##, respectively. Due to the 4-momentum relation, we have ##p_{1i}p_{1}^{'i} = e_{1}e_{1}' - p_{1} \cdot p_{1}' = e_{1}e_{1}' - p_{1} \cdot p_{1}' \cos{\theta_{1}}##, here ##\theta_{1}## is the angle of scattering of the incident particle ##m_{1}##, and the ##e_{1}## is the energy of particle ##m_{1}##. Finally we can derive the equation for scattering angle ##\theta_{1}##:

$$\cos{\theta_{1}} = \frac{e_{1}'(e_{1} + m_{2}) - e_{1}m_{2} - m_{1}^{2}}{p_{1}p_{1}'}$$

In Landau's book The Classical Theory of Fields, section 13, a function of ##\theta_{1}## is derived as follows if the rest mass of incident particle ##m_{1}## is larger than the mass of another particle ##m_{2}##:

$$\sin{\theta_{1\, max}} = \frac{m_{2}}{m_{1}}$$

But how could we derive this result?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


If we don't consider the relativity, an equation for ##\theta_{1}## can be derived:

$$\cos{\theta_{1}} = \frac{(1 + \alpha) \beta^{2} + 1 - \alpha}{2\beta}$$

where ##\alpha = \frac{m_{2}}{m_{1}}## and ##\beta = \frac{v_{1}'}{v_{1}}##. Since ##\alpha## is a constant, we can find the extreme of ##\theta_{1}## by treating ##\beta## as an independent variable.:

$$ \frac{\mathrm d}{\mathrm d \beta}\cos{\theta_{1}} = 0$$

From above equation we obtain ##\cos{\theta_{1\, min}} = \frac{2\beta}{1 + \beta^{2}}## for ##\alpha = \frac{1 - \beta^{2}}{1 + \beta^{2}}##. Finally we get ##\sin{\theta_{1}}_{max} = \frac{m_{2}}{m_{1}}##.

But if we are considering the relativity, the equation for ##\theta_{1}## is hard to simplify. How can I resolve this? Thank you for the advice.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kalok87 said:
$$\cos{\theta_{1}} = \frac{e_{1}'(e_{1} + m_{2}) - e_{1}m_{2} - m_{1}^{2}}{p_{1}p_{1}'}$$
But if we are considering the relativity, the equation for ##\theta_{1}## is hard to simplify. How can I resolve this? Thank you for the advice.
It is messy, but it will work out. It might be helpful to write the above equation as $$\cos{\theta_{1}} = \frac{ae_{1}' -b}{p_{1}\sqrt{e_{1}'^2-m_1^2}}$$where ##a## and ##b## are certain constants. Show that the derivative of the right hand side equals zero when ##e_{1}' = \large \frac{a m_1^2}{b}##.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top