Scattering Vs Absorption Crossection

therimalaya
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
What is the difference between Scattering Crossection and Absorption Crossection in nuclear reaction crossection?

Please help me for one numerical problem;

"Arsenic As^{33}_{75} has an absorption cross section for thermal neutrons of 4.1 b and a scattering cross section of 6 b, its density is 5.73 gm per cm cube. A beam of thermal neutrons is passed through a slab of arsenic 2 cm thick. By what fraction is the intensity of the beam reduced? [Avogadro Constant=6.023 x 10^{23} mole^{-1} and 1 b=10^{-24} sq cm.]"
 

Attachments

  • Arsenic  33As75 has an absorption cross section for thermal neutrons of 4.jpg
    Arsenic 33As75 has an absorption cross section for thermal neutrons of 4.jpg
    19.3 KB · Views: 510
Physics news on Phys.org
crossection is the probability for an even to occur, the event can be inelastic scattering, elastic scattering, absorption, etc.

So it is just a measurment of the probability for an event, the larger crossection - the more likley. The units of crossection is area.

Now this a HW-related problem, and I encourage you to google/ search your book, for the experimental definition of crossection, and then give it a try yourself, then we will help you.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top