Schechter Function of Galaxy Luminosity-Density relationship

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on confusion regarding Equation 1.18 in Linda Sparke's "Galaxies in the Universe," specifically the introduction of the variable n-star, which represents the number density of L* galaxies, or Milky Way-sized galaxies. The value given for n-star is .019h^3 per Megaparsec, with h denoting the universe's expansion rate. The equation's context and implications for understanding galaxy luminosity and density relationships are highlighted. The participant expresses a desire for further clarification and acknowledges the need for more formal education on the topic. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding these variables in astrophysics.
sderamus
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hello. I'm plowing through Linda Sparke's "Galaxies in the Universe: An Introduction". I'm enjoying it quite well and learning a lot. But then I get to Equation 1.18 in the book and am a little confused because it uses variables not previously introduced.

Not sure if I can do it here but the equation introduces a quantity n-star, but doesn't define how it gets in there or what it is. The text gives n-star's value as .019h^3 per Megaparsec. h is the expansion rate of the universe. Is this the number of stars per Megaparsec? And of course correcting for the expansion of the Universe.

I'm sure I'll have quite a few more questons as I go along with this book. Wish I had the time to take some real courses in this. Oh well.

All feedback appreciated.

TIA

Sterling
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The precise definition can be found here:

http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/astronomy/SchechtersLuminosityFunction.html"

You can think of it roughly as being the number density of L* galaxies, which are Milky Way-sized galaxies.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
553
Back
Top