Schrodinger equation normalization to find A -Griffiths

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the normalization of a time-independent wave function as presented in David Griffiths' Introduction to Quantum Mechanics. The original poster questions the justification for dropping the sine term in the integration process used to find the normalization coefficient A.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the reasoning behind the omission of the sine term in the integral, with some suggesting that additional context from the textbook may clarify this point. Others discuss the implications of boundary conditions on the values of the spatial frequency k.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing insights and questioning the completeness of the information provided in the textbook. Some have offered potential explanations related to boundary conditions, while others express uncertainty about the placement of the thread within the forum.

Contextual Notes

There is a suggestion that the textbook may contain further information regarding the value of the wave function at specific boundaries, which could impact the normalization process. Participants note the lack of explicit justification in the text for the steps taken by Griffiths.

Gary Roach
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In David Griffiths Introduction to Quantum Mechanics (2nd ed.), page 32 he normalizes a time independent wave function to get the coefficient A. He dropped the sine part of the integration with no explanation. What is the justification.

Homework Equations


The time independent wave function given is \varphi = Asin(kx)
Griffiths gets :
\int^{a}_{0}|A|^{2}sin^{2}(kx) dx = |A|^{2}\frac{a}{2} = 1
But:
cos(2kx) = 1 - 2sin^{2}(kx)
and:
sin^{2}(kx) = \frac{1}{2} - \frac{1}{2}cos(2kx)
This means that the integral should really give:
|A|^{2}(\frac{a}{2} - \frac{1}{4k}sin(2ka))

The Attempt at a Solution


What is the justification for dropping the sine term.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Should this be in the homework section? Anyway, with the information given, there is no justification. But I am guessing there is more information given in the book. Does it say anything about what the value of the wave function is when x=a?
 
The spatial frequency k takes on only certain values in order to satisfy the boundary conditions. For those values, you have that sin(2ka)=0.
 
Yes at x=a, x=0
Also not sure where this should go. It is a clarification of the textbook not a homework problem. At least this was my reasoning. I've been wrong before.

Gary
 
Thank you Vela.
I had fogotten that. That makes sense. It's too bad that Griffiths didn't point this out. Generally the text is great, especially for self study but he sloughs thing sometimes.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K