Schrodinger equation, normalizing

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on normalizing the wave function of a particle in an infinite potential well and deriving the dependence of the normalization constant B on the parameter b. The normalization condition leads to the expression B = √(2/(a(1 + b²))). Following normalization, the expectation value of energy is calculated using the momentum operator, with the formula for energy expressed in terms of the wave function. A question arises regarding the complexity of calculating the second derivative of the wave function, prompting a search for a simpler method. The conversation highlights the challenges of quantum mechanics calculations and the importance of normalization in determining physical properties.
SoggyBottoms
Messages
53
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider the infinite well, a particle with mass m in the potential

V(x) =<br /> \begin{cases}<br /> 0, &amp; 0 &lt; x &lt; a,\\<br /> \infty, &amp; \text{otherwise,}<br /> \end{cases},<br />

At t = 0 the particle is in the state:

\Psi(x,0) = B \left[\sin{\left(\frac{l \pi}{a}x\right)} + b\sin{\left(\frac{2l \pi}{a}x\right)}\right]
with b a real number and l a whole number. Use normalization to show how B depends on b.

1 = B^2 \int_0^a \left[\sin{\left(\frac{l \pi}{a}x\right)} + b\sin{\left(\frac{2l \pi}{a}x\right)}\right]^2 dx \\<br /> = B^2 \left(\frac{1}{2} \int_0^a (1 - \cos{\left(\frac{2 l \pi}{a}x\right)})dx + \frac{b^2}{2} \int_0^a (1 - \cos{\left(\frac{4 l \pi}{a}x\right)})dx + <br /> b\int_0^a \cos{\left(\frac{l \pi}{a}x\right)}dx + b\int_0^a \cos{\left(\frac{3 l \pi}{a}x\right)}dx\right)\\<br /> = B^2(\frac{a}{2} + \frac{b^2a}{2})

B = \sqrt{\frac{2}{a(1 + b^2)}}

Did I do this correctly?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks correct.

ehild
 
Thanks.
 
Now I have to calculate the expectation value of the energy. E = \frac{p^2}{2m}, so \langle E \rangle = \langle \frac{p^2}{2m} \rangle and with \langle p \rangle = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \Psi^{\ast} \frac{\hbar}{i} \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \Psi dx we get:

\langle E \rangle = \frac{-\hbar^2}{2m} \frac{2}{a(1 + b^2)} \int_0^a \Psi^{\ast} \frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2} \Psi dx

Is the integrand simply equal to \frac{d^2}{dx^2} \left[\sin{\left(\frac{l \pi}{a}x\right)} + b\sin{\left(\frac{2l \pi}{a}x\right)}\right]^2? Because that becomes a really long calculation, so I was wondering if there is another way...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top