Schrodinger Equation, Potential

Jonnyb42
Messages
185
Reaction score
0
Schrodinger Equation, "Potential"

This is a very simple question, but I am confused.

I have seen Potential and Potential Energy interchanged.. yet still referred to as potential. Is the "potential" function in the schrodinger equation really a potential function or potential energy? (units of energy or volts)

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org


The V(x) in Schrödinger's equation has units of energy, and should be properly called the "potential energy function." But people and books tend to be sloppy and call it just the "potential".

You can see most clearly that the units are energy by looking at the time-independent S.E.:

$$-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \nabla^2 \psi(x,y,z) + V(x,y,z) \psi(x,y,z) = E \psi(x,y,z)$$

In order to make the units consistent, V and E must have the same units, and E is energy.
 


wow... thank you.

This is just what I thought, and I still heard it as potential.
 
Last edited:
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top