Schrodingers Equation in 3 space Dimension

  • Thread starter Thread starter hell18
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dimension Space
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the interpretation of vectors in three-dimensional space and the implications for quantum theory, particularly in relation to Schrödinger's equation. Participants clarify that a position vector in three dimensions consists of three components, typically labeled x, y, and z, and caution against confusing the vector notation with its components. The conversation also touches on the concept of time as a one-dimensional element, which, when combined with the three spatial dimensions, results in a four-dimensional framework. However, it is noted that the fourth dimension is not directly observable. Understanding these concepts is deemed essential before delving into the complexities of the Schrödinger equation.
hell18
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
i read a book on quantium theory, it states that a vector of x = x,y,z. When i think about 3 dimensional space, we cannot see that, is that correct?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
We live in 3d space, addition of a time coordinate makes it 4d.

I am not sure what you are asking.
 
A large part of our confusion is "vector of x = x,y,z". What do YOU mean by a "vector of x"?

Certainly it is true that a "position vector" must have 3 components: typically labeled x, y, z: that's what "3 dimensional" MEANS. It would not be very good practice to give a vector the same name as one of its components!
 
Maybe he meant to bold the x for the vector? Still not goood usage, since one expects x = (x1,x2,x3).
 
i thought a vector was a small section of the whole. but i don't think that is the case. In the book it says a 3 dimensional space vector of x = x,y,z. So space is 3d? so time is a 1 dimensional element? add those together get 4d? but i thought we cannot see the 4th dimension? or am i missing something out?
 
I think you need to go back and study some precalculus. You need to spec up on some geometric concepts before tackling the Schroedinger equation.

A vector has two qualities, magnitude and direction. (Bear with me vector space fans, sufficient unto the day is the rigor thereof). For example a force has its magnitude (so many Newtons) and the direction in which it is applied. If you set up coordinates with an origin, any point is determined by a vector whose magnitude is the distance from the origin and whose direction is the direction from the origin to the point. This particular vector is called the radius vector.

Vectors have components. If you set up x y and z axes at right angles to each other, then a given radius vector will have projections on those axes and the length of the projections will give the components. So if the vector v has compnents a, b, and c we write v = (a,b,c).

This works for three dimensions, but relativity requires four, and that is another story entirely. Don't worry about it yet; the Schroedinger equation at the beginning level is not relativistic.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
971
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
61
Views
5K
Back
Top