Schroedinger Equation in Momentum Space

Domnu
Messages
176
Reaction score
0
Problem
Derive the Schroedinger equation (for harmonic oscillator) in momentum space.

The attempt at a solution
We have

ih \frac{\partial}{\partial t} \langle p' | \alpha \rangle = \langle p' | \frac{p^2}{2m} | \alpha \rangle + \langle p' | V(x) | \alpha \rangle
\iff ih \frac{\partial}{\partial t} \langle p' | \alpha \rangle = \frac{p'^2}{2m}\langle p' | \alpha \rangle + \left(i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial p'}\right)^2 \langle p' | \alpha \rangle
<br /> \[<br /> \iff ih\frac{\partial \Phi(p)}{\partial t} = \frac{p^2}{2m}\Phi(p) - \hbar^2 \frac{\partial^2 \Phi(p)}{\partial p^2}<br /> \]<br />

Is the above correctly done? If so, is this the generalized Schroedinger equation (without electrodynamics, etc.. just p^2/2m kinetic energy)?:

<br /> \[<br /> \iff ih\frac{\partial \Phi(p)}{\partial t} = \frac{p^2}{2m}\Phi +\displaystyle\sum_{n = 0}^\infty \frac{V^{(n)}(0)}{n!}\left(i\hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial p}}\right)^n \Phi<br /> \]<br />

Thanks very much for your help :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes and yes (but V and its derivatives should be evaluated at 0, not x).
 
Avodyne said:
Yes and yes (but V and its derivatives should be evaluated at 0, not x).

Yes, sorry that was a typo. :) Thanks very much!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top