1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Support PF! Reminder for those going back to school to buy their text books via PF Here!
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Classical Schwinger or Jackson?

  1. Feb 10, 2015 #1
    So, I'm taking a graduate course on EM and I don't know which textbook to take: Jackson's book or Schwinger's? Any suggestions?
     
    Last edited: Feb 10, 2015
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 10, 2015 #2

    DEvens

    User Avatar
    Education Advisor
    Gold Member

    Have you a prof? What text does he suggest? Presumably the course will have some homework assignments.

    There's one sound
    That no one knows
    What does the prof say?

    Jackson is one of those classics that everybody wants everybody else to have read.

    Of course, Schwinger is available for Kindle. Oh, for about the same as the paperback version of Jackson.
     
  4. Feb 10, 2015 #3
    Well, he recommends both of them and he said he will be giving exercises from both of these texts, although I have a feeling that most of these will be from Jackson since it's the standard and there are more copies in the library.
     
  5. Feb 11, 2015 #4
    I don't know about Schwinger's but Jackon's book is great (trust me).
     
  6. Feb 14, 2015 #5

    vanhees71

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    2016 Award

    Jackson is the standard source. I like it very much, but Schwinger is simply a master piece, and I like. It's full of gems. Alone the treatment of cylindrical Bessel functions with elegant operator techniques is worth the whole book.

    I don't like both books conceptionally wise so much. They are both written from a classical perspective. From a HEP/nuclear theoretical physicist's point of view, classical electromagnetism should be introduced as a relativistic classical quantum field theor (and it's in fact the paradigmatic example of one such theory with the clear advantage that it describes a vast amount of observable facts and has far-reaching applications in electrical engineering, electronics, and optics). The best book from this point of view is, in my opinion, Landau&Lifshitz vol. 2 or Scheck's Theoretical Physics book vol. 3 (I'm not sure whether there's an English translation of the latter, but the German edition is great).
     
  7. Feb 15, 2015 #6

    dextercioby

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Hi Hendrik, yes Scheck's book was translated also under Springer Verlag. Indeed, an excellent book.
     
  8. Feb 16, 2015 #7

    vanhees71

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    2016 Award

    Great!
     
  9. Feb 16, 2015 #8

    dextercioby

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

  10. Feb 19, 2015 #9

    CalcNerd

    User Avatar
    Education Advisor
    Gold Member

    Buy the one most used in class, and if your professor is going to swap about equally, then you probably should buy both. You can buy an older edition of Jackson, it is the standard and older editions are probably readily available for a LOT less money than the newest edition (also look at Indian publishers).

    My next advice, buy a study guide if you can and buy an REA or Schaum's workbook. I had a professor that couldn't be bothered with stupid questions (the only kind I knew how to ask...), so that was a necessity for me. We used two textbooks, Jackson and Griffiths. Griffiths was far easier to read and the problems were far easier to do. I suspect Grittiths was really an undergrad text, but it complemented Jacksons and allowed the class to comprehend the more difficult concepts.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Schwinger or Jackson?
  1. Jackson & Q.E.D. (Replies: 3)

  2. Math for Jackson (Replies: 9)

  3. Jackson for QED (Replies: 1)

  4. Zangwill vs. Jackson (Replies: 7)

Loading...