Is Biogeometry a Legitimate Science?

  • Thread starter Thread starter emanaly
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Science
AI Thread Summary
Biogeometry is recognized as a legitimate scientific discipline that focuses on the shapes of biological species, distinct from the concept of sacred geometry, which may misrepresent its principles. This emerging field integrates computational geometry, biochemistry, biophysics, statistics, and chemistry, aiming to develop innovative computational techniques for analyzing biological structures. It combines concepts from various areas, including algorithms, geometry, topology, graphics, robotics, and databases, to tackle fundamental biological issues, particularly the relationships between structure and function in biological molecules. The discussion also touches on the challenges of terminology in scientific discourse, highlighting a skepticism towards buzzwords and the emergence of new interdisciplinary fields.
emanaly
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Hi All,
Is there a real science called Biogeometry?
 
Biology news on Phys.org


yes, there's a legitimate biogeometry (study of the shapes of species, pretty much). But there's also "sacred geometry" which makes use (abuse?) of it as well. That might confuse things.
 


There is a legitimate study being done, not to be mistaken for the Egyptian hand waving stuff.

Biogeometry is an emerging scientific discipline at the interface between
computational geometry, biochemistry and biophysics, statistics, and chemistry
that brings together specialists in the above disciplines to develop new
computational techniques and paradigms for representing, storing, searching,
simulating, analyzing, and visualizing biological structures. Biogeometry
embraces ideas from a wide range of areas of computer science and mathematics,
including algorithms, geometry, topology, graphics, robotics, and databases to
address some of the most fundamental biological problems such as structurefunction
relationships for biological molecules.

http://helix-web.stanford.edu/psb05/intro-biogeometry.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:


I'm allergic to buzzwords. On the other hand, I guess that makes me a pioneer of the brand-new interdisciplinary field of immunolinguistics! :-p
 


yeah, I've been having trouble with "dynamic", "chaos", and "complex systems" myself...
 
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'
The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...
Whenever these opiods are mentioned they usually mention that e.g. fentanyl is "50 times stronger than heroin" and "100 times stronger than morphine". Now it's nitazene which the public is told is everything from "much stronger than heroin" and "200 times stronger than fentany"! Do these numbers make sense at all? How do they arrive at them? Kill thousands of mice? En passant: nitazene have already been found in both Oxycontin pills and in street "heroin" here, so Naloxone is more...
Back
Top