Search for New Particles: How Far Can We Go?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bugatti79
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particles
bugatti79
Messages
786
Reaction score
4
Folks,

There's hype lately regarding the Higgs boson in which some results from CERN are to be revealed next tuesday detailing its existence or not. Then I heard about a new type of force field called technicolour which would indicate a new type of particle.

The question I have is, how do we know that there are not a million types of different particles.

Ie, the harder you smash atoms, newer particles are discovered (thats my interpretation)

They seem to be discovering new particles all the time...where does it end?

thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
bugatti79 said:
Folks,

There's hype lately regarding the Higgs boson in which some results from CERN are to be revealed next tuesday detailing its existence or not. Then I heard about a new type of force field called technicolour which would indicate a new type of particle.

The question I have is, how do we know that there are not a million types of different particles.

Ie, the harder you smash atoms, newer particles are discovered (thats my interpretation)

They seem to be discovering new particles all the time...where does it end?

thanks

That was true a few decades ago, but particle discovery has slowed down a lot. Just about all the particles predicted by QCD (quark theory) have been discovered, with the Higgs being the big holdout. Some think that there are no more particles, some expect that that very high energy particles called supersymmetric partners exist.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top