Searching for REU's: Tips & Recommendations

  • Thread starter Thread starter DukeLuke
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tips
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the search and application process for Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REUs), particularly in high energy and nuclear physics. Participants recommend applying to multiple programs, ideally 6-7, due to the competitive nature of these opportunities. Experiences shared include positive feedback on REUs at the University of Pittsburgh and Wisconsin, highlighting the friendly atmosphere and diverse research projects. It's noted that many programs favor underrepresented groups, which can enhance chances of acceptance. There is debate about the effectiveness of contacting professors for more information on projects; while some advise against it due to potential annoyance, others suggest expressing interest in specific projects within application essays to demonstrate seriousness. Mentioning relevant previous research experience is also encouraged to strengthen applications.
DukeLuke
Messages
92
Reaction score
0
I'm currently in the process of searching for and applying to various REU’s and I would like to know if any PF members have participated in a great program and would recommend that I take a look at it. I have searched through the NSF database so I have a good idea of what's out there, I'm just wondering if anyone has something specific to recommend. If it helps most of the projects that I'm interested in are related to high energy or nuclear physics. Any other advice pertaining to applying for REU's would also be great.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Apply to 6-7, as long as your recommenders don't mind. Getting into any of these is great. I can't say in particular if there is a bad REU or a good one. I went to one at Wisconsin and I really enjoyed my time there. It's a good introduction to research and hopefully, you get to live in another part of the country and experience new things.
 
I did two REUs at the University of Pittsburgh. If they still have funding for this year, I highly recommend the program. The department has a friendly atmosphere and there is a lot of cool research projects in all different fields.

My advice for applying to REU's is in line with Jason's. Apply to a lot of programs. The programs are very competitive and hard to get into since their are a limited number of positions. For example, my first summer at Pitt, there were 13 people admitted into the program, but several hundred applied.
 
for better or for worse, many programs like to give preference to under represented groups. So if you are within one of these demographics, apply to as many as possible and I am sure you'll get in somewhere. I like the REU's they offer at CUNY/Columbia/NYU (they operate jointly quite a lot) but I am partial to the NY area.
 
G01 said:
I did two REUs at the University of Pittsburgh. If they still have funding for this year, I highly recommend the program. The department has a friendly atmosphere and there is a lot of cool research projects in all different fields.

According to Pitt's website they missed out on funding for 2009, which is too bad.

One more question, do you think that it would be a good idea to contact professors whose projects I'm interested into get more information? While it would be a good way to learn more about a project I can see how it might backfire if the professor thought it was a way to bypass applications or "suck up" so to speak.
 
I personally did not contact professors. I have heard that many professors consider prospective grad students contacting them annoying. So, I can only imagine how annoying prospective REU interns are! Even if they are nice enough to respond, they'll more than likely just give you a link to their group webpage, which you could have found easily by yourself.

I would definitely express interest in specific projects and professors in your personal essay most programs will ask for. This will show that you are serious about applying to their program. Another good idea is to point out that you have previous research in a similar area (don't lie if you don't have this experience).
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top