Second order circuit need some confirmation on the steps involved.

  • Context: Engineering 
  • Thread starter Thread starter berry1991
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit Second order
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 2K views
berry1991
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find v(t) for all t>0. Use second order method.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Before the switch is closed:
solving for i:
-80+160i+80i+80i=0
i=0.25A

KCL:
From node v(t):
[C dv(t)/dt] + i(t) + [V(t)/4] + [(v(t)-80i)/80]+[(v(t)-80)/160] = 0

KVL:
v(t)=L di(t)/dt

Later on solve the 1st equation for i(t), then substitute into KVL equation.
 

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    13.9 KB · Views: 359
on Phys.org
Consider replacing everything before the switch with a Norton equivalent.

Have you learned about Laplace transforms yet?
 
yes, but the question ask us to use 2nd order to solve it.
Do we need to take in account for the dependent source?
we convert it to 80*0.25=20V
 
berry1991 said:
yes, but the question ask us to use 2nd order to solve it.
In my opinion, I don't think that using Laplace transforms to solve the differential equation would be cheating...
Do we need to take in account for the dependent source?
we convert it to 80*0.25=20V
Yes, the dependent source makes a difference, but you may be surprised by the resulting Norton equivalent. The Norton equivalent should have a current source in parallel with a resistance; 20V is not a current (nor is the the correct Thevenin voltage).