Second order diagram for the "scalar graviton"

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the second-order diagram for the scalar graviton, starting with the equations for the first-order perturbation, h_0 and h_1. The author substitutes h = h_0 + h_1 + h_2 into the equation of motion, leading to the result for h_2 as ##\Box h_2 = 2 \lambda h_0 h_1##. The factor of 2 indicates that the proposed last diagram is indeed correct. This analysis contributes to understanding the behavior of scalar gravitons in perturbative gravity.
Hill
Messages
735
Reaction score
576
Homework Statement
Write down the next-order diagrams. Check the answer using Green's function method.
Relevant Equations
Equation of motion: ##\Box h - \lambda h^2 -J =0##
It has been shown in the text that ##h_0 = \frac 1 {\Box} J## with the diagram
1709130278067.png

and that ##h_1 = \lambda \frac 1 {\Box} (h_0 h_0) = \lambda \frac 1 {\Box} [( \frac 1 {\Box} J)( \frac 1 {\Box}J)]## with the diagram
1709130451437.png


I was not sure if the next order diagram is
1709130608327.png

or rather
1709130745770.png

Thus, I substitute ##h=h_0+h_1+h_2## in the equation of motion and calculate to the ##\mathcal O(\lambda^2)##. I get ##\Box h_2 = 2 \lambda h_0 h_1##.
I understand that the factor 2 means that the last diagram above is correct.
Is it so?
 
At first, I derived that: $$\nabla \frac 1{\mu}=-\frac 1{{\mu}^3}\left((1-\beta^2)+\frac{\dot{\vec\beta}\cdot\vec R}c\right)\vec R$$ (dot means differentiation with respect to ##t'##). I assume this result is true because it gives valid result for magnetic field. To find electric field one should also derive partial derivative of ##\vec A## with respect to ##t##. I've used chain rule, substituted ##\vec A## and used derivative of product formula. $$\frac {\partial \vec A}{\partial t}=\frac...