Second Order Differential Equation

danny271828
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
I need to solve the equation

\frac{d^{2}}{dx^{2}}\Psi + \frac{2}{x}\frac{d}{dx}\Psi = \lambda\Psi

Can anyone help me get a start on this problem? I've been guessing at a few solutions with no results... I'm not asking anyone to solve the problem... just a few hints on starting... maybe regarding the form of the solution... Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
danny271828 said:
I need to solve the equation

\frac{d^{2}}{dx^{2}}\Psi + \frac{2}{x}\frac{d}{dx}\Psi = \lambda\Psi

Can anyone help me get a start on this problem? I've been guessing at a few solutions with no results... I'm not asking anyone to solve the problem... just a few hints on starting... maybe regarding the form of the solution... Thanks

Multiply throught by x^2 to get,
x^2 \Psi '' + 2x\Psi ' - \lambda x^2 \Psi = 0
Now I believe this can be converted to Bessel's equations.
The solution is in terms of Bessel functions (possibly using the Bessel function of the 3rd kind, i.e. Hankel function).
 
If it is not a form of Bessel's equation, use Frobenius' method.
 
Dont know if this would work, but you could substitute p=dy/dx, and convert this into a linear DE in p. Once you get a solution for p, replace p by dy/dx and that's another linear DE to solve.
 
chaoseverlasting said:
Dont know if this would work, but you could substitute p=dy/dx, and convert this into a linear DE in p. Once you get a solution for p, replace p by dy/dx and that's another linear DE to solve.
But there is no "y" in the problem! Presumably you meant \Psi but then, since \Psi itself appears in the equation, that substitution won't work.
 
HallsofIvy said:
But there is no "y" in the problem! Presumably you meant \Psi but then, since \Psi itself appears in the equation, that substitution won't work.

Yeah. Sorry... Didnt realize that.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top