Second-Order Differential Equation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that a specific function is a solution to the second-order differential equation m x''(t) = -k x(t). The subject area includes differential equations and their solutions, particularly focusing on harmonic motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the method of transforming the differential equation into a polynomial and discuss the implications of assuming a solution form. There are attempts to derive the solution using exponential functions and trigonometric identities, while some participants question the necessity of starting with the given solution.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with various approaches being explored. Some participants have provided guidance on how to verify the proposed solution by substitution, while others are engaging in deriving the solution through different methods. There is no explicit consensus on a single approach, but multiple interpretations are being examined.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention a challenge from their physics teacher to solve the problem without directly using the provided solution, indicating a constraint on the approach taken.

Char. Limit
Gold Member
Messages
1,222
Reaction score
23

Homework Statement


Prove that for the differential equation m x''(t) = -k x(t), one solution is x=A cos(\omega t), where \omega = \sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}.


Homework Equations



x^2+1 = (x+i)(x-i)

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, I haven't taken differential equations yet, but I understand that you have to turn this differential equation into a polynomial somehow. Then, the roots of that polynomial give you the solution. I need the details, though...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since you're given a solution, you can prove it satisfies the equation simply by plugging it in.

More generally, for a homogeneous differential equation with constant coefficients, you can assume a solution of the form y=erx. Plug that into the differential equation and see what you get.
 
Hmm... all right, let's assume that's the case...

if x=A e^(rt), then x'' = r^2 A e^(rt), and so...

m r^2 A e^(rt) = - k A e^(rt)

Divide both sides by A e^(rt), because that's never zero...

m r^2 + k = 0

Divide both sides by k...

\frac{m}{k} r^2 + 1 = 0

\left(\sqrt{\frac{m}{k}} r\right)^2 + 1 = 0

\left(\sqrt{\frac{m}{k}} r + i\right) = 0, r = -\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}} i = -\omega i

\left(\sqrt{\frac{m}{k}} r - i\right) = 0, r = \sqrt{\frac{k}{m}} i = \omega i

So, we get...

x(t) = A ( e^{\omega i t} + e^{-\omega i t}) = A cos(\omega t)

Is that right?
 
Why not start with x(t) = Acos(wt), take m times the second derivative, and confirm that it is equal to -kx(t)?
 
Because our physics teacher challenged us to do it the hard way.
 
Yes, that's right. Any linear combination of the two solutions you found, eiωx and e-iωx, in particular cos ωx, will also be a solution.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K