Second quantization of field operators

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the verification of the relation involving the particle density operator \(n(\bold{x})\) and the state \(|\phi\rangle = \psi^\dagger(\bold{x'})|0\rangle\) from "Advanced Quantum Mechanics" by Franz Schwabl. The participant successfully applies the fermionic commutation relations to show that \(n(\bold{x})|\phi\rangle = \delta(\bold{x}-\bold{x'})\psi^\dagger(\bold{x})|0\rangle\), confirming that \(|\phi\rangle\) describes a particle at position \(\bold{x'}\). The discussion emphasizes the interpretation of the delta function and its implications in quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically second quantization.
  • Familiarity with particle density operators and their definitions.
  • Knowledge of fermionic and bosonic commutation relations.
  • Basic grasp of delta functions and their properties in mathematical physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the delta function in quantum field theory.
  • Explore the role of particle density operators in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about the mathematical rigor in quantum mechanics, focusing on operator algebra.
  • Investigate the differences between fermionic and bosonic statistics in quantum fields.
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, particularly those studying quantum field theory and second quantization, as well as physicists interested in the mathematical foundations of particle physics.

grilo
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


(from "Advanced Quantum Mechanics", by Franz Schwabl)
Show, by verifying the relation
[tex]\[n(\bold{x})|\phi\rangle = \delta(\bold{x}-\bold{x'})|\phi\rangle\][/tex],
that the state
[tex]\[|\phi\rangle = \psi^\dagger(\bold{x'})|0\rangle\][/tex]
([tex]\[|0\rangle =\][/tex]vacuum state) describes a particle with the position [tex]\bold{x'}[/tex].

Homework Equations


The particle density operator [tex]n(\bold{x})[/tex] is defined as
[tex]n(\bold{x}) = \psi^\dagger(\bold{x})\psi(\bold{x})[/tex]


The Attempt at a Solution


Acting on the given state with the particle density operator, I got
[tex]n(\bold{x})|\phi\rangle = \psi^\dagger(\bold{x})\psi(\bold{x})\psi^\dagger(\bold{x'})|0\rangle = \psi^\dagger(\bold{x})(\delta(\bold{x}-\bold{x'}) \pm \psi^\dagger(\bold{x'})\psi(\bold{x}))|0\rangle[/tex]
by the (fermion) boson (anti-)commutation rules. Since [tex]\psi(\bold{x})[/tex] annihilates the vacuum:
[tex]n(\bold{x})|\phi\rangle = \delta(\bold{x}-\bold{x'})\psi^\dagger(\bold{x})|0\rangle[/tex]

which looks like the given equation, but [tex]\psi^\dagger(\bold{x})|0\rangle[/tex] describes a particle at the position [tex]\bold{x}[/tex].
Integrating the last equation in [tex]\bold{x}[/tex] gives back the original state [tex]|\phi\rangle[/tex], though.

I'm not sure wheter I misunderstood something or it's just a matter of interpretation.
Can anyone help me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The delta function is only non-zero when x = x', so you are free to set these two parameters equal outside the delta function.

So remember: [tex]\delta(x-y) f(y) = \delta(x-y) f(x)[/tex]. We can just pretend x and y are equal outside the delta function. The expression is zero anyway when x and y are not equal.
 
Ah... thanks! I kinda thought that, but was afraid of being lousy. I try to keep my physics as mathematically rigorous as possible, so sometimes I run into those little issues. (:

Thanks again!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K