See PF in Scientific American Oct/Nov

  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The Scientific American network will promote PF in either the October or November edition, potentially increasing site traffic. While some members are skeptical about the impact of magazine promotions, others believe that many readers of Scientific American will check out the site. There is enthusiasm for creating PF merchandise, such as T-shirts and other items, with suggestions for funny designs and sayings. The discussion also touches on the idea of a dedicated area for discussing current articles from Scientific American. Overall, the announcement has generated excitement and anticipation among members.
Messages
19,774
Reaction score
10,728
I have been given notice that the Scientific American network (10 or so sites) will be promoted in either the Oct or Nov edition of Sciam (may include international edition). So keep an eye out for PF if you pick up those months issues! :approve:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thats great news Greg! How much more traffic do you expect that to generate?
 
Kurdt said:
Thats great news Greg! How much more traffic do you expect that to generate?

No idea. Prolly not that noticable to most members.
 
wanna bet?
 
tribdog said:
wanna bet?

you think a lot of people visit sites listed in a magazine?
 
Congrats, Greg! You're hitting the Big Time!

I think a lot of people read SciAm. But how many pay attention to the promotion - I guess we'll see. Maybe you should get a batch of PF T-shirts, tote bags, . . . . :biggrin:

PF swimwear would be cool :-p
 
Mugs and mouse pads... :smile:
 
Astronuc said:
Maybe you should get a batch of PF T-shirts, tote bags, . . . . :biggrin:

For the first few years we did run a cafepress store with PF shirts! I have thought about bringing it back with "at cost" prices.
 
Greg Bernhardt said:
For the first few years we did run a cafepress store with PF shirts! I have thought about bringing it back with "at cost" prices.

That would be great!
 
  • #10
Greg Bernhardt said:
For the first few years we did run a cafepress store with PF shirts! I have thought about bringing it back with "at cost" prices.
Are there any T-shirts in stock?

Did they have pockets?

Actually I prefer sleeveless T-shirts - but they've got to have a pocket.
 
  • #11
Design a PF t-shirt competition.
 
  • #12
Astronuc said:
Are there any T-shirts in stock?

Did they have pockets?

Actually I prefer sleeveless T-shirts - but they've got to have a pocket.

We have sleeveless. No pockets though.

Kurdt said:
Design a PF t-shirt competition.

Or at least funny PF sayings or PF gags.
 
  • #13
My university physics society was desperate to come up with something funny to go on the back of their hoodies. In the end they went with a picture of a cat with the caption: "Wanted: dead or alive. Schrödinger's cat."
 
  • #14
Astronuc said:
Actually I prefer sleeveless T-shirts - but they've got to have a pocket.

Just out of curiosity, why? You can just tape your pocket protector directly to your shirt.
 
  • #15
Greg Bernhardt said:
Or at least funny PF sayings or PF gags.

I like that.

Congrats on SciAm announcement. This is very cool!
 
  • #16
Kurdt said:
My university physics society was desperate to come up with something funny to go on the back of their hoodies. In the end they went with a picture of a cat with the caption: "Wanted: dead or alive. Schrödinger's cat."
:smile:
 
  • #17
Greg Bernhardt said:
Or at least funny PF sayings or PF gags.

The word "Crackpots" with a slash across it? :)

Zz.
 
  • #18
Ivan Seeking said:
Just out of curiosity, why? You can just tape your pocket protector directly to your shirt.
It would just pull off. Besides the pocket is for scrap paper. I can clip the pens, mechpencils and highlighters to the collar. Having a pocket is just more convenient.
 
  • #19
ZapperZ said:
The word "Crackpots" with a slash across it? :)

Zz.

How about:
 

Attachments

  • crack.png
    crack.png
    7.7 KB · Views: 476
  • #20
:smile: that works. All I have in my head now is the Ghostbusters theme.
 
  • #21
cristo said:
How about:


Or maybe:
 

Attachments

  • crkpt.png
    crkpt.png
    13 KB · Views: 502
  • #22
Greg Bernhardt said:
you think a lot of people visit sites listed in a magazine?

depending on the review yes I do. Especially the kind of people who read Scientific American. Especially a site like PF. I think there are a lot of people out there who will check it out. I don't know how many will stick around, but I'd expect a huge hit when the magazine comes out.
 
  • #23
Nice one janus! I'd make the circle just a bit bigger so you can easliy see the cracked pot.

Congrats Greg!
 
  • #24
Congrats!
May people who're invited to join PF take here more seriously from now on!
 
  • #25
Evo said:
Nice one janus! I'd make the circle just a bit bigger so you can easliy see the cracked pot.

Congrats Greg!

Maybe more like this?
 

Attachments

  • crkpt.png
    crkpt.png
    35.9 KB · Views: 500
  • #26
Greg Bernhardt said:
you think a lot of people visit sites listed in a magazine?
My experience is that people do. We'll keep an eye out :smile:
 
  • #27
The sciam partners finally made the Dec issue. Our link is on page 32! :smile:
 
  • #28
Ooooh, wonderful!

Congratulations Greg!
 
  • #29
Janus said:
Or maybe:

No chamberpots allowed? :biggrin:
 
  • #30
Greg Bernhardt said:
The sciam partners finally made the Dec issue. Our link is on page 32! :smile:

A full page for the partners! Very cool.
 

Attachments

  • Dec SciAm.JPG
    Dec SciAm.JPG
    31.2 KB · Views: 451
  • #31
Greg Bernhardt said:
you think a lot of people visit sites listed in a magazine?

LOL! My entire "favorites" list started out as SciAm's list of "50 Coolest Websites"!
 
  • #32
Greg Bernhardt said:
you think a lot of people visit sites listed in a magazine?

LOL! My entire "favorites" list started out as SciAm's list of "50 Coolest Websites"!

BTW: should we have an area (maybe in "General Discussion") just for talking about thecoolest stuff in the current monthly issue? I do enjoy that mag, and sometimes I feel like I want to engage in discourse regarding some of the articles, but I don't want to expose the unwaery to any "spoilers".
 
  • #33
I think if you will start a thread about any article that'll be OK. Opening new area/subforum before it is obvious there is enough material to fill it doesn't work.
 

Similar threads

Replies
55
Views
15K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
287
Views
25K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
50
Views
9K
Back
Top