Seeking clarification of time dilation

acesuv
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
"Since we are always at rest with respect to ourselves, ignoring the effects of acceleration, our lifetime, as measured by us, will always appear shorter than it appears to others. To others our clocks will seem to run slow. But we will die, alas, on the cue of the internal timer that travels with us. In special relativity the grass is greener on the other person's lawn." - Euclid's Window, PG 188

I've been under the impression that when you are moving, your clock will slow down; however, the above passage seems to imply that being at rest is what slows your clock down.

What's going on here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To start with, all motion is relative. There is no absolute at rest.

When you observe a clock moving close to the speed of light it appears to be going slower. However someone traveling with that clock looking at your clock will observe it is going slower.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_relativity

See above for a detailed description.
 
hi acesuv! :smile:
acesuv said:
… our lifetime, as measured by us, will always appear shorter than it appears to others.

suppose you live 70 years, on a spaceship, and you return to Earth to die

you will return more than 70 years later according to an Earth clock, so an observer who stays on Earth will say that you lived for more than 70 years :wink:
 
mathman said:
To start with, all motion is relative. There is no absolute at rest.

When you observe a clock moving close to the speed of light it appears to be going slower. However someone traveling with that clock looking at your clock will observe it is going slower.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_relativity

See above for a detailed description.

If you observe other clocks as going slower when they move relative to you, then why are they the ones that age faster? The passage implies that I should be the one whose clock is slowing down from my frame of reference, I think.
 
tiny-tim said:
hi acesuv! :smile:


suppose you live 70 years, on a spaceship, and you return to Earth to die

you will return more than 70 years later according to an Earth clock, so an observer who stays on Earth will say that you lived for more than 70 years :wink:

acesuv said:
If you observe other clocks as going slower when they move relative to you, then why are they the ones that age faster? The passage implies that I should be the one whose clock is slowing down from my frame of reference, I think.

Sorry guys; I got myself confused! I was associating a slowing of time with less aging; however, the opposite is actually true. "Slowing", meaning "less speed", I got myself confused...

Thanks for the help
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top