You'll have to be more specific about what you want to know.
1. What is your current educational background in physics ?
2. What do you want to know about a quantum well ? Is a definition enough ? I can think of at least several tens of pages of text that are relevant to your question in some way or the other.
A few relevant topics that come to mind (beyond just a basic definition) are :
1. Growth of quantum wells (heterostructures)
2. Solving the Time Indep. Schrodinger Equation for wells of different shapes
3. Tunneling
4. Approximations : WKB, Perturbation theory, Variational methods, tight binding, etc.
5. Band structure, transitions between bands and sub-bands, optical properties
6. 2D Electrons in Electric and Magnetic fields - the Quantum Hall states
So, are you saying that there aren't any female physicists, or that no female physicists frequent these fora, or that female physicists don't mind being called sir?
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles.
Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated...
Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/
by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
I don't know why the electrons in atoms are considered in the orbitals while they could be in sates which are superpositions of these orbitals? If electrons are in the superposition of these orbitals their energy expectation value is also constant, and the atom seems to be stable!