Seemingly easy quantum question

  • Thread starter Thread starter bon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the minimum value of the function E(p,x) = p^2/2m + 1/2mw^2 x^2 under the constraint xp = 1/2 h/2pi. The initial approach involves taking partial derivatives to locate critical points, but the user encounters an issue when both derivatives equal zero at x=p=0. The solution suggests applying the constraint to express one variable in terms of the other, allowing E to be rewritten as a single-variable function. This method simplifies the problem and facilitates finding the minimum value, which is determined to be 1/2 h/2pi w. The discussion emphasizes the importance of properly incorporating constraints in optimization problems.
bon
Messages
547
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that the minimum value of E(p,x) = p^2/2m + 1/2mw^2 x^2 with respect to the real numbers p,x when they are constrained to satisfy xp = 1/2 h/2pi is 1/2 h/2pi w.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Ok so this seems to just be a case of finding the minimum of a function of two variables.

But if we have f=f(x,y) then min is where partial f by dx i.e. fx = fy = 0

But partial E/dx = mw^2 x and partial E/dp = p/m..so where these both = 0 x=p=0! Where have i gone wrong?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dude, use the constraint that you've mentioned.
from the constraint, get one variable in terms of the other and substitute for it in the expression for E.
E would then be a function of just one variable...
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top