Selection system - Gambling system

  • Thread starter Thread starter woundedtiger4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    gambling System
woundedtiger4
Messages
188
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

Currently I am trying to understand the concept of Selection System given in Billingsley's book "Probability and Measure". I have attached a pdf file with this post which consists on the scanned pages of this topic. I have understood it completely except one thing that how has the text calculated the values of "N_n". In the attached file there is an example 7.4 in which the values of N_1, N_2, N_3, and N_4 are given but I don't understand that how to calculate them or where have the come from though I do understand there role in the calculation of Y_n.

Thanks in advance.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
The random variable N_n indicates at what time the n'th bet will take place.

For example, if B1=0, B2=0, B3=1, B4=0, B5=1.

Then the first bet will occur in the 3th stage (because 3 is the first number n such that Bn=1). Thus N1=3.
The second bet will occur in the 5th stage (because 5 is the second number n such that Bn=1). Thus N2=5.
 
micromass said:
The random variable N_n indicates at what time the n'th bet will take place.

For example, if B1=0, B2=0, B3=1, B4=0, B5=1.

Then the first bet will occur in the 3th stage (because 3 is the first number n such that Bn=1). Thus N1=3.
The second bet will occur in the 5th stage (because 5 is the second number n such that Bn=1). Thus N2=5.

thank you sir.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top