Self study supplements for geometry?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on seeking effective supplemental materials for self-studying geometry, particularly in preparation for upcoming calculus and physics courses. The individual has a textbook and workbook focused on proof writing and is looking for additional online resources, especially for learning proof techniques not covered in Khan Academy videos. They emphasize the importance of building a solid geometric foundation for future studies in differential geometry and tensor analysis. Recommendations include Jurgensen's Geometry text, which the individual has found helpful and proof-oriented, as well as potential interest in Lang's Geometry and Kiselev's Geometry books, both of which are noted for their positive reviews and depth. The conversation highlights the necessity of understanding geometric principles formally to enhance mathematical skills for advanced coursework.
QuantumCurt
Education Advisor
Messages
726
Reaction score
166
Please move this if it's not the appropriate section of the forum.

Could anyone point me towards some good supplements for self studying geometry? I just finished trigonometry, and I'm starting calculus, and algebra/trig based physics in a few weeks once fall courses start. However, I've never taken a geometry course before, and I feel like that is going to be a major gap in my math education. I've done a decent amount of self study of it, and I'm fairly comfortable with the more common measurement formulas. I feel like I should spend some more time on it, learning how to write proofs, do constructions, etc.

I've got a textbook, https://www.amazon.com/dp/0395977274/?tag=pfamazon01-20 , as well as the accompanying study guide/workbook, and solutions manual.

Could someone point me towards some good supplemental online material? I've watched basically every geometry video on Khan Academy, and they've been helpful, but there is a lot of material that isn't covered there, namely proof writing.

Any help would be much appreciated. :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Ditto. I feel like I should have a more solid geometrical foundation both for computer graphics and for differential geometry.
 
Yeah, I feel like it would be a very good idea. I'm starting calculus in the fall, and the calc teacher I'm going to have is also a geometry teacher. I've been warned that he likes to incorporate a lot of geometry into his calculus fairly early on.

I'm going through the textbook that I have. It's actually the text that he uses in his geometry classes. Very heavily oriented on proof writing. I've gotten through the first two chapters so far today, but these are the very basic chapters on points, lines and planes. Simple stuff that I basically already know intuitively, but I'm forcing myself to take the time to understand it all formally, so I can build up some proof writing skills. I'm fairly comfortable with most of the measurement formulas already, I just need to go through and learn the "why this works" aspects of it. As far as the basic properties of lines and angles and whatnot goes, that stuffs basically just intuitive.

I think it will be very beneficial to get a better grasp on it. I'll be taking differential geometry, and other geometry type courses like tensor analysis sometime down the line, so having a solid knowledge of the basics should be beneficial.

By the way, are you the same TomServo from College Confidential? I'm comfortablycurt over there.
 
lugita15 said:
This thread has some recommendations for geometry textbooks:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=701905

Thanks!

I've got Jurgensen's Geometry text, which is what I've been working through for the last week since summer courses ended. I've made it through the first 4 chapters already. It's basically all stuff that I know intuitively, but I'm forcing myself to sit down and learn it from a formal standpoint. It's a great book so far. Very in depth, and very proof oriented.

I'm considering the Lang Geometry book. I've gotten several recommendations for Lang's Calculus book as a supplementary book for my calculus courses, and Lang's Geometry seems to have pretty positive reviews as well.

I'm also considering picking up the Kiselev Geometry books. It sounds like they're classics, and seem to be very highly regarded.

I'm seeing some recommendations for both of those in that thread, so I might go ahead and grab those ones soon.
 
For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!
I’ve heard that in some countries (for example, Argentina), the curriculum is structured differently from the typical American program. In the U.S., students usually take a general physics course first, then move on to a textbook like Griffiths, and only encounter Jackson at the graduate level. In contrast, in those countries students go through a general physics course (such as Resnick-Halliday) and then proceed directly to Jackson. If the slower, more gradual approach is considered...

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
15K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
28
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top