I Semi ln plot- uncertainty estimation

AI Thread Summary
Calculating uncertainty from a semi-logarithmic plot can lead to significant discrepancies if not handled correctly. The discussion highlights the confusion surrounding the standard error derived from linear fitting and its impact on the calculated value of J'. The uncertainty in J' should account for variations in the fitted value, leading to a more accurate representation of uncertainty. A more refined approach may reveal asymmetric uncertainties, but initial estimates can be approximated by analyzing deviations. Ultimately, understanding the mathematical implications of uncertainty in exponential functions is crucial for accurate results.
Imperatore
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Hello there!

There is a problem with calculating the uncertainty from semi- ln plot. The linear fitting gives standard errors as you can see in attached picture. In the Y axis are ln J values, obviously. If the intersection with y-axis, x=0, then we get the point y=b=-33,21, and it's ln J', so the J' equals: exp(-33,21), ok it works fine. But the uncertainty of J' gives then value of exp(0,212), which is about 10^14 factor greater than the calculated value of J'.

What's wrong with my solution?
 

Attachments

  • semi ln plot.jpg
    semi ln plot.jpg
    49.9 KB · Views: 577
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Imperatore said:
But the uncertainty of J' gives then value of exp(0,212)
That is not what it gives. The uncertainty of 0.212 means your value 33.21 could also be 0.212 larger or smaller (there is a more mathematical statement behind it, but let's keep it at that level). What is exp(33.21 ± 0.212)?
 
  • Like
Likes Imperatore
I got it. Uncertainty is |exp(-33.21-0.212)-exp(-33.21+0.212)| equals 1,6 e-15 Is it really that simple?
 
It is not that simple, and a better treatment would likely lead to asymmetric uncertainties. But looking at the up and down deviation gives some reasonable approximation.
 
  • Like
Likes Imperatore
Oh, I should devided that relation |exp(-33.21-0.212)-exp(-33.21+0.212)| by 2, obviously.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top