Senior Thesis in Math: What Am I Supposed to Do?

  • Thread starter Thread starter johnqwertyful
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Senior Thesis
AI Thread Summary
Concerns about the nature of a senior thesis are highlighted, particularly regarding the expectation of originality versus expository work. The discussion revolves around the challenge of grasping complex mathematical concepts, especially in the context of a thesis connecting partial differential equations (PDEs) and Brownian motion. The individual expresses uncertainty about whether the goal is to present existing derivations clearly or to contribute new findings. They acknowledge that their work involves replicating established derivations, which raises questions about the value of their contributions. The notion that many senior theses are expository rather than original is noted, leading to the belief that the primary purpose may be personal learning rather than groundbreaking research. Seeking guidance from an advisor and reviewing examples of previous theses are suggested as ways to clarify expectations and focus efforts effectively.
johnqwertyful
Messages
396
Reaction score
14
I'm doing a senior thesis and I'm a little worried. It seems like it's just expository. The concepts have been hard enough for me to grasp (a lot of graduate math. I've taken some graduate classes. But more), especially with all my other classes. I have this quarter and next quarter to do it, which sounds like a lot but isn't really

Am I supposed to prove something new? It sounds like the goal is just to arrange things other people have done in a clear and concise way. Is that what I'm supposed to do? Is that okay?

I'm working on the connection between PDEs and Brownian motion. Starting off with Feynman's path integral formulation of quantum mechanics (which is basically to me, copy a long derivation. It IS a cool derivation (and cooler result) and I am learning from doing so), then introducing Brownian motion through Einstein or Smoluchowski derivation of Heat equation using Brownian motion (again, copy a few long derivations). Then introduce Feynman Kac formula, and talk about Wick rotation to tie the Heat and Shrodinger equations together.

It just seems like everything I'm writing has been done somewhere else, I'm just copying derivations basically. I mean I'm making them my own, and trying to understand them. But is that okay? I mean I'm only an undergrad, and these things are very hard to understand for me. Am I supposed to prove a new theorem? What is there to prove? If professional mathematicians can't prove the theorem, how the hell am I supposed to?

Is the point to just copy everything done before? Maybe tie things together, arrange it in a way?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Perhaps the purpose of the project is to teach the reader how to derive the connection. So you may need to explain keypoints of the derivation some of which might not have been explained in the derivations you are sourcing.
 
If I just learn how to derive all these connections, I learned a lot But I didn't really contribute anything. Is that the point? Is a senior thesis just for me to learn stuff? I thought it was to contribute or prove some new theorem or something. I mean, I'm 21 and have a little bit less than an undergraduate education of math, how CAN I prove anything new?
 
I've been looking online a lot, it seems most senior thesis are expository. I guess that's not what I had in mind.
 
if you were to prove something truly original and new then that would really be a PhD dissertation right?

I'd talk with your advisor about it and perhaps ask for an example of one so you know what to expect and so you can focus your energies appropriately.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top