Seq Limits: Xn, Yn & Lim n→∞ = 0?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dannysaf
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limits Sequence
dannysaf
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Let lim n →∞ XnYn = 0. Is it true that Limn →∞ Xn= 0
or Limn →∞Yn = 0 (or both)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lim n →∞ XnYn = lim n →∞ Xn * lim n →∞ Yn

One or even both limits need to be 0 so that lim n →∞ Xn * Yn =0

I guess you are right. :smile:
 
njama said:
lim n →∞ XnYn = lim n →∞ Xn * lim n →∞ Yn

Well, this is only true when both xn, and yn have limits. So, what if they don't? :wink: Say, what if they're oscillating?
 
njama said:
lim n →∞ XnYn = lim n →∞ Xn * lim n →∞ Yn


This equation is only correct if the individual limits on the right-hand side exist. The proposition in the original post is false and can be disproven with a counterexample.
 
Yup, sorry I forgot to mention that the series must converge, in other way they would be divergent and we could not separate them.
 
Simple counterexample. Clearly, \lim 1/n = \lim \(n \cdot 1/n^2 \) = 0 but we have that \lim n = +\infty and \lim 1/n^2 = 0.
 
VietDao29 said:
Well, this is only true when both xn, and yn have limits. So, what if they don't? :wink: Say, what if they're oscillating?

This example satisfies the original claim that at least one of the sequences converges to 0. A counter example for this must consist of two sequences whose product vanishes but both sequence do not converge to 0.

--Elucidus
 
Elucidus said:
This example satisfies the original claim that at least one of the sequences converges to 0. A counter example for this must consist of two sequences whose product vanishes but both sequence do not converge to 0.

--Elucidus

You've misquoted yet again, Elucidus.. :cry: :cry:

You shouldn't forget to wear your glasses, then.. :wink:
 
VietDao29 said:
You've misquoted yet again, Elucidus.. :cry: :cry:

You shouldn't forget to wear your glasses, then.. :wink:

Indeed. I'm surprised. I was trying to quote this post:

fmam3 said:
Simple counterexample. Clearly, \lim 1/n = \lim \(n \cdot 1/n^2 \) = 0 but we have that \lim n = +\infty and \lim 1/n^2 = 0.

To which my original comment makes more sense. Sorry for any confusion.

--Elucidus
 
  • #10
Let x_n be alternately 1 and 0, let y_n be alternately 0 and 1.
Then x_n y_n = 0 for all n, but neither individual limit exists. In particular, neither individual limit is zero.
 
  • #11
g_edgar said:
Let x_n be alternately 1 and 0, let y_n be alternately 0 and 1.
Then x_n y_n = 0 for all n, but neither individual limit exists. In particular, neither individual limit is zero.
Excellent example. However, neither x_n nor y_n converges and the O.P. finally told us.
Yup, sorry I forgot to mention that the series must converge, in other way they would be divergent and we could not separate them.
 
  • #12
HallsofIvy said:
Excellent example. However, neither x_n nor y_n converges and the O.P. finally told us.

HallsofIvy I am not the O.P, mate. :biggrin: I was just adding, additional explanation of my first post. :cool:
 
Back
Top