We have recurrent sequence of integer number a_{1},a_{2},...
a1=1, a2=2
a_{n}=3a_{n-1}+5a_{n-2} for n=3,4,5,...
Is integer number k>=2, that (a_{k+1}*a_{k+2}) mod a_{k} = 0 ?
We have recurrent sequence of integer number a_{1},a_{2},...
a1=1, a2=2
a_{n}=3a_{n-1}+5a_{n-2} for n=3,4,5,...
Is integer number k>=2, that (a_{k+1}*a_{k+2}) mod a_{k} = 0 ?
Please for quick help :)
You need to clarify your post A(2) = 2. A(3)*A(4) = 11*43 is not divisible by A(2). Do you mean to ask whether for some integer n that a_{n}|a_{n+1}*a_{n+2}?
Last edited:
#3
terafull
3
0
Yes. I must find some integer n (exactly k), where this modulo statement is true.
Thanks for reply :)
#4
dodo
695
2
I was doing some number crunching to reduce the possibilities for k, but I'm still far from an answer.
So far, I get the following:
If b, a, 3a+5b, 14a+15b, ... are contiguous elements of the sequence, then we see that, if a_n=b is even, then a_{n+3}=14a+15b is also even. And since there happens to be an even element among the first 3 (namely, a_2=2, then one every 3 elements from that point on (a_5, a_8, a_{11}...) will be even too.
In short, since a_2=2,
n \equiv 2 \ (mod\ 3) \ \ \Rightarrow \ \ 2|a_n
Which means that the desired k cannot be congruent to 2 (mod 3), because a_k would have a factor 2 that (a_{k+1} * a_{k+2}) doesn't have.
and given that a_3=11, a_4=43, a_5=23\ .\ 8, a_6=13\ .\ 59 \ \mbox{and}\ a_8=17\ .\ 794, we also have
n \equiv 3 \ (mod\ 12) \ \ \Rightarrow \ \ 11|a_n
n \equiv 4 \ (mod\ 11) \ \ \Rightarrow \ \ 43|a_n
n \equiv 5 \ (mod\ 11) \ \ \Rightarrow \ \ 23|a_n
n \equiv 6 \ (mod\ 12) \ \ \Rightarrow \ \ 13|a_n
n \equiv 8 \ (mod\ 18) \ \ \Rightarrow \ \ 17|a_n
and all these conditions (including the one above about even numbers) must be avoided by your k candidate. However, there are still plenty of valid candidates remaining.
Hello !
I derived equations of stress tensor 2D transformation.
Some details: I have plane ABCD in two cases (see top on the pic) and I know tensor components for case 1 only. Only plane ABCD rotate in two cases (top of the picture) but not coordinate system. Coordinate system rotates only on the bottom of picture.
I want to obtain expression that connects tensor for case 1 and tensor for case 2.
My attempt:
Are these equations correct? Is there more easier expression for stress tensor...
Are there known conditions under which a Markov Chain is also a Martingale? I know only that the only Random Walk that is a Martingale is the symmetric one, i.e., p= 1-p =1/2.