Sequence of Measurable Functions

jdcasey9
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let {fn} be a sequence of measurable functions defined on a measurable set E. Define E0 to be the set of points x in E at which {fn(x)} converges. Is the set E0 measurable?

Homework Equations



Proposition 2:

Let the function f be defined on a measurable set E. Then, f is measurable if and only if for each open set O, the inverse image of O under f, f-1(O) = {x\inE | f(x) \in 0}, is measurable.

The Attempt at a Solution



Since E0 = {x\inE| {fn(x)} converge}, then {fn(x)} \in O and by Proposition 2, E-10 is measurable. But, that doesn't mean that E is measurable...

Isn't it true that continuous E-1 being measurable implies E is measurable? Is that where I should go with this?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
jdcasey9 said:

Homework Statement



Let {fn} be a sequence of measurable functions defined on a measurable set E. Define E0 to be the set of points x in E at which {fn(x)} converges. Is the set E0 measurable?

Homework Equations



Proposition 2:

Let the function f be defined on a measurable set E. Then, f is measurable if and only if for each open set O, the inverse image of O under f, f-1(O) = {x\inE | f(x) \in 0}, is measurable.

The Attempt at a Solution



Since E0 = {x\inE| {fn(x)} converge}, then {fn(x)} \in O and by Proposition 2, E-10 is measurable. But, that doesn't mean that E is measurable...

Isn't it true that continuous E-1 being measurable implies E is measurable? Is that where I should go with this?

Have you shown lim inf and lim sup of a sequence of measurable functions are measurable (possibly with values in the extended reals)? The set of convergent points are where those two functions are equal.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top