Series/Parallel Circuit: Identifying Resistor Placement

  • Thread starter Thread starter Leslie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit
AI Thread Summary
Resistors are in series if the current flows through one resistor and must continue to the next without branching. In contrast, resistors are in parallel if the current can choose between multiple paths to reach the resistors. The total resistance in a series circuit is greater than any individual resistor, while in parallel, it is less than the smallest resistor. The configuration can be visually identified by examining the connections between terminals. Understanding these principles is essential for analyzing series/parallel circuits effectively.
Leslie
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
How do you know if a resistor is in series or parallel in a series/parallel circuit?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi, and welcome to Physics Forums.

Two resistors are in series if the current leaving the first resistor is undivided by branching before entering the second resistor. That is, you should be able to draw a line on the circuit diagram from one resistor to the other without hitting a point at which the current branches off.

Two resistors are in parallel if the current that enters each resistor flows from the same node or source without passing through any other elements and if the current that leaves each resistor flows to the same node or sink without passing through any other elements.

See your textbook for illustrations.

edit: fixed an omission
 
The way that's always helped me think of a parallel configuration of resistors is that of both having the same potential difference across them.
 
I think the last explanation puts the cart before the horse.

Here is a simple explanation. If the current that travels through one resistor must flow through another resistor, the two resistors are in series.

If current has a choice between going through one resistor or another, then the two are in parallel.
 
Additionally,

If you have resistors in series, the total resistance is greater than anyone of the resistances.

If you have resistors in parallel, the total resistance is smaller than the smallest of the resistances.

R(series)=R_1 + R_2 + R_3 +...

R(parallel)=[1/R_1 + 1/R_2 + 1/R_3 +...]^{-1}
 
I think of it this way.

Series: one terminal of R1 meets only one terminal of R2 (and no other element at that junction)

<br /> \begin{verbatim}<br /> ---R1---+---R2---<br /> \end{verbatim}<br />

Parallel: corresponding terminals of R1 and R2 meet

<br /> \begin{verbatim}<br /> ---R1--- <br /> \end{verbatim}\begin{verbatim}<br /> ---+ +--- \end{verbatim}<br /> \begin{verbatim}<br /> ---R2---\end{verbatim}<br />
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Thread 'A scenario of non-uniform circular motion'
(All the needed diagrams are posted below) My friend came up with the following scenario. Imagine a fixed point and a perfectly rigid rod of a certain length extending radially outwards from this fixed point(it is attached to the fixed point). To the free end of the fixed rod, an object is present and it is capable of changing it's speed(by thruster say or any convenient method. And ignore any resistance). It starts with a certain speed but say it's speed continuously increases as it goes...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top