Series Soln to a Diff Eqn: can't understand one of the steps

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a second-order differential equation, specifically the equation y" - 2xy' + y = 0. Participants are examining a transition in a series solution presented in a textbook, focusing on the justification of a step involving summation indices.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the justification for transitioning between two forms of a summation, particularly regarding the treatment of the term when n=0. There is an exploration of the implications of this term on the overall summation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants engaging in back-and-forth questioning about the validity of the steps taken in the series manipulation. Some guidance has been offered regarding the relevance of the n=0 term, but there is no explicit consensus on the interpretation of the summation changes.

Contextual Notes

Participants are operating under the constraints of a homework problem, which may limit the depth of exploration into the underlying theory. The focus remains on the specific manipulation of series terms rather than broader concepts.

kostoglotov
Messages
231
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement



solve y" - 2xy' + y = 0

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



in the worked example, the book gets from

here:

[tex]\sum\limits_{n=0}^{\infty} (n+1)(n+2)c_{n+2}x^n - \sum\limits_{n=1}^{\infty}2nc_nx^n + \sum\limits_{n=0}^{\infty}c_nx^n = 0[/tex]

to here:

[tex]\sum\limits_{n=0}^{\infty} [(n+1)(n+2)c_{n+2} - (2n-1)c_n]x^n = 0[/tex]

by way of:

[tex]\sum\limits_{n=1}^{\infty}2nc_nx^n = \sum\limits_{n=0}^{\infty}2nc_nx^n[/tex]

How is this last part justified?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the value of ##2nc_nx^n## when ##n=0##?
 
DEvens said:
What is the value of ##2nc_nx^n## when ##n=0##?

I considered that. It's zero. But assuming [itex]c_n[/itex] exists, won't [itex]2nc_nx^n \neq 0 \ for \ n=1[/itex]?
 
kostoglotov said:
I considered that. It's zero. But assuming [itex]c_n[/itex] exists, won't [itex]2nc_nx^n \neq 0 \ for \ n=1[/itex]?

Yes, but that is irrelevant. The two sums differ by the presence/absence of the ##n = 0## term, which is zero!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kostoglotov

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K