Serious problem with centripetal force

Prometium
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The soluble problem We have a disc, horisontal, which is rotating 0.5 revolutions per second. A block is placed on this disc with the mass 0.6 kg and 0.2 meters from the shaft. First, I convert 0.5 rates per second to T = 2 seconds. w = 2∏/2 --> w = ∏ --> m = 0.6 kg --> r = 0.2 meters

Fc = (0.6)(0.2)(∏)^2 --> Fc = 1.184352528 N --> Fc = 1.2 N

This is correct according to facit. So easy, but I just wanted to show how different this is in comparism to the coming one.
The insoluble problem A carousel, where the distance between centre and attachment to chain is 0.8 meters, the chain is 1.0 meter long and weight in the chain 1.0 kg. T = 4.0 s. Now, centripetal forces is asked, and I do the same as above: w = 2∏/4 --> w = ∏/2

Fc = (1.0)(0.8)(∏/2)^2 --> Fc = 1.97392088 N

This is according wrong according to:

http://www.walter-fendt.de/ph14d/karussell.htm

Even though the latter is hanging in a chain, the horizontal force should be the same; but resulting different. In Walter Fendt, they have found out that the radius is 1.06 m (0.8 + 0.26). The angle is unknown, but they have through 0.26 m counted this: sin a = 0.26/1.00 --> a = 15.

Homework Equations



Fc = mrw^2

w = 2∏/T


What have I missed?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What does 'rates per second' mean? Is it supposed to be 'radians per second' or 'revolutions per second'?
 
SteamKing said:
What does 'rates per second' mean? Is it supposed to be 'radians per second' or 'revolutions per second'?


It was supposed to mean "revolutions per seconds". In fact, I have always believed that RPM on the motorcycle and cars meant rate per minute, but I did just learn that it means revolutions per minute. English is my second language.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top