Servo-Constraints in Mechanics - Comments

  • Thread starter Thread starter wrobel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mechanics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a new blog post titled "Servo-Constraints in Mechanics." Feedback highlights the need for improved readability, suggesting darker text and corrections for typos. Participants express confusion regarding the article's clarity, particularly about the definition and significance of servo constraints and the historical context from 1922. There is a suggestion that the article may be aimed at a knowledgeable audience rather than beginners. Overall, the need for clearer explanations and context in the article is emphasized.
wrobel
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,156
Reaction score
994
Greg Bernhardt submitted a new blog post

Servo-Constraints in Mechanics
rotational_mechanics.png


Continue reading the Original Blog Post.
 

Attachments

  • rotational_mechanics.png
    rotational_mechanics.png
    12.4 KB · Views: 960
  • Like
Likes Chestermiller, fresh_42 and Greg Bernhardt
Physics news on Phys.org
The article would be easier to read if the type was darker.
 
Fix typo: "pendulum started" instead of "pendulum stated" ?
 
Stephen Tashi said:
Fix typo: "pendulum started" instead of "pendulum stated" ?
Thank you, there must be "pendulum is placed" ,i do not know how to fix it
 
it is very interesting, but its value is negative, because it does not state the problem to solve, meaning what are servo constraints? what "problem" did it solved (back in 1922)?
or maybe this is an article directed to whom ever knows the THING and not layman, if so...apologies.
 

Thread 'Inclined treadmills and Galilean Invariance'

This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
View full post »

Thread 'Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?'

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
View full post »

Similar threads

Demystifying the Often Misunderstood Bernoulli's Equation - Comments
Replies
19
Views
3K
I Constraints of a mechanical system
Replies
5
Views
2K
Statistical Mechanics Part II: The Ideal Gas - Comments
Replies
11
Views
3K
Statistical Mechanics Part I: Equilibrium Systems - Comments
Replies
19
Views
3K
Analytical Mechanics: Regularity Conditions on Constraint Surface
Replies
7
Views
1K
"Classical Physics Is Wrong" Fallacy - Comments
3
Replies
142
Views
14K
Insights 9 Reasons Quantum Mechanics is Incomplete - Comments
3
Replies
118
Views
13K
Why do we need the Lagrangian formulation of Mechanics?
Replies
8
Views
2K
Direct Echo-Based Measurement of the Speed of Sound - Comments
2
Replies
87
Views
23K
Against "interpretation" - Comments
7
Replies
343
Views
32K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top