Servo motor duty cycle vs. supply voltage

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the effective supply voltage required for a servo motor controlled by a PID controller, which currently operates at a 50% duty cycle. The user calculates an effective voltage of 2V, factoring in a 1V drop across the driver, leading to a conclusion that the servo should handle a supply voltage between 9-15V. The response clarifies that the voltage limit depends on whether it is instantaneous or average; if average, the user's calculations are deemed correct. The importance of understanding the nature of the voltage limit is emphasized for proper servo operation. This highlights the need for precise calculations when determining supply voltage for optimal performance.
280Z28
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I have a servo motor that I'm controlling with a simple PID controller for a constant frequency square wave with varying duty cycle. My supply voltage is 5.17V with ~1V drop across my low side driver. The controller sits right around 50% duty cycle to keep the servo open to position A. A reference source states that it should take a 14-26% duty cycle to keep it open to position A. What should the supply voltage be, counting again a 1V drop across the driver?

By my calculation, I've applied an effective (time averaged) 2V source.

2/.26 + 1 = 8.7V
2/.14 + 1 = 15.3V

Is this the correct calculation/conclusion that the servo is built to handle a 9-15V supply?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
280Z28 said:
Is this the correct calculation/conclusion that the servo is built to handle a 9-15V supply?

That depends on the nature of the 9-15V limit. If it is instantaneous (unlikely) then duty cycle doesn't matter. If it is average (more likely) your calculation is correct.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...

Similar threads

Back
Top