Severe Condition (85°C/95% or Water Immersion)

  • Thread starter Thread starter mjjabines
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Condition Water
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the most severe environmental test for a product, comparing a Damp Heat Test at 85°C with 85% and 95% relative humidity (RH), and a Water Immersion Test at 85°C to a depth of 1 meter. The routine Accelerated Life Test (ALT) for electronics is highlighted as 85% RH at 85°C for 1000 hours, which identifies issues related to assembly methods and moisture accumulation. Concerns are raised about potential dendritic growth in poorly cleaned assemblies, leading to electrical failures. The user seeks faster testing methods for WDM optical components under severe conditions. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the importance of selecting the right test to ensure product reliability in harsh environments.
mjjabines
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello All,

I'm currently testing a product for environmental test but i don't know what test do i conduct for this one.

I would like to ask your help if which is more severe environment.

1. Damp Heat Test (85°C / 85% R.H)
2. Damp Heat Test (85°C / 95% R.H)
3. Water Immersion Test (85°C at 1 meter depth)

And may i know why? thank you...
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
A routine "Accelerated Life Test" (ALT) for electronic products is 85% RH at 85C for 1000 hours, while powered-up and operating. This test finds problems with assembly methods, cleanliness, and "microclimates" (enclosed areas of the assembly where moisture can accumulate and not evaporate). If you have assembly cleanliness issues and enclosed microclimates (like inside potted assemblies), you can get dendritic growth/migration of copper between traces at different voltages, which eventually leads to the traces shorting out or opening.

I'm not familiar with a 95% RH test, nor a submersion test. What kind of product are you testing?
 
I'm planning to test WDM optical components quickly at severe environment to see its performance over time.

85% RH at 85C for 1000 hours is a routine test for us but they want a faster results.
 
http://theriac.org/DeskReference/viewDocument.php?id=61
Read the caveat at the bottom of the pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Back
Top