High School Shape & Dimensions of Containers: Impact on the Maxwell Boltzmann Distribution

Click For Summary
The Maxwell Boltzmann distribution does not change based on the shape of the container, provided that pressure and volume remain constant. The available states for gas particles are considered independent of the container's shape in macroscopic systems. In microscopic systems, the Maxwell Boltzmann distribution is not applicable. Additionally, the distribution does not look the same in two dimensions due to differences in the density of states, necessitating a different normalization factor. Overall, the shape of the container has minimal impact on the distribution in macroscopic scenarios.
sol47739
Messages
38
Reaction score
3
TL;DR
I have some basic questions about the Maxwell Boltzmann distribution
1.Does the Maxwell Boltzmann distribution change depending on the shape of the container? Pressure and the volume is constant. How is the Distribution affected whether the gas is in: a,sphere b,cube c,cuboid?
Why does/doesn’t the distribution change depending on the shape of the container? 2.Does the Maxwell Boltzmann distribution look the same in 2 dimensions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sol47739 said:
TL;DR Summary: I have some basic questions about the Maxwell Boltzmann distribution

1.Does the Maxwell Boltzmann distribution change depending on the shape of the container? Pressure and the volume is constant. How is the Distribution affected whether the gas is in: a,sphere b,cube c,cuboid?
Why does/doesn’t the distribution change depending on the shape of the container?2.Does the Maxwell Boltzmann distribution look the same in 2 dimensions?
No to both, I would say.

For 2.: The density of states is not the same in 2D so the Normalization factor has to be different.

For 1.: I would think that the available states don't depend on the shape of the container if the container is macroscopic. For a microscopic system the MB-distribution can't be used anyway.
 
Topic about reference frames, center of rotation, postion of origin etc Comoving ref. frame is frame that is attached to moving object, does that mean, in that frame translation and rotation of object is zero, because origin and axes(x,y,z) are fixed to object? Is it same if you place origin of frame at object center of mass or at object tail? What type of comoving frame exist? What is lab frame? If we talk about center of rotation do we always need to specified from what frame we observe?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K