Shape of Projectile: Elliptical Equation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the possibility of deriving an elliptical equation for the shape of a projectile's trajectory. Participants express confusion over the question's vagueness and question the premise that a projectile's path could be elliptical. The general consensus is that there is no theoretical basis for a projectile's trajectory to be described as elliptical. The conversation highlights the need for more specific parameters or context to explore the topic further. Overall, the idea of an elliptical projectile trajectory lacks support in the current understanding of physics.
Smit
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Can we derive the equation of a projectile to be elliptical.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a very vague question. You need to be more specific.

In general, I see no reason what a projectile's shape should even BE elliptical, much less be "derivable" as such. I really have no idea what you are talking about.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Back
Top