Shielding Effect: What Is It & How Does It Work?

  • Thread starter Thread starter phymatter
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Shielding
AI Thread Summary
The shielding effect refers to the repulsion between inner shell electrons that reduces the effective nuclear charge felt by valence electrons. As atomic number increases, electron-electron repulsion leads to increased atomic radius due to enhanced shielding. In a column of the periodic table, atomic radius increases downwards because each new period adds a complete electron shell, which increases shielding and decreases the nucleus's pull on valence electrons. Conversely, across a period, atomic radius decreases as the number of protons increases without additional shielding, resulting in a stronger attraction to the nucleus. Understanding these concepts clarifies the behavior of atomic sizes in relation to electron shielding.
phymatter
Messages
131
Reaction score
0
What actually is shielding effect ?? In particular my book says that the size of Ga is smaller than Al because of poor shielding effect of d electrons ,
but what is this shielding effect , imean how does it work?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
shielding effect can be defined as:
"the repulsion b/w the inner shells(electrons)"
you will know that there is repulsion b/w electrons so as atomic number increases i.e no of electroms or shell increases which couse electron-electron repulsion and similarly repulsion on electrons of valece shell produces and so radius of atom is increases.there fore we are saying that atomic radius is directly proportional to shielding effec.and shielding effect is directly proportion to shells.

as i m a student of mathematics so sorry for bad presentation.
 
I had a problem on this just last week. Here's the link I was given when I asked about it; it was very helpful and should answer all of your basic questions: http://dl.clackamas.cc.or.us/ch104-06/shielding_electrons.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Your Gallium and Aluminum example is either a special case, or incorrect. This is because within a family (elements in the same column) atomic radius increases as you go down, and within a period (elements in the same row) atomic radius decreases.

This can be explained by electron shielding. Electron shielding is when the electrons in the energy levels below the valence electrons attenuate the strength of the positive charge 'emanating' from the nucleus. You can think of shielding as a sort of chipping away at the "positiveness" of the nucleus. The more complete electron orbitals beneath the valence level, the more shielding there is- resulting in a weaker "positiveness" of the nucleus as you move down a column on the periodic table.

With this in mind, one can understand why exactly it is that atoms tend to increase in radius as you go down a column in the periodic table. Each time you jump down one period, you are completing an octet, thereby adding a brand new level of shielding. As mentioned ealier, this increased shielding results in a lowering of the "positiveness" of the nucleus. Because of this attenuation of the strength of the nucleus, valence electrons aren't pulled as strongly by the nucleus, resulting in them having a wider "orbit".

An anology might be to think of the solar system. If the sun were to suddenly lose 1/2 it's mass, the planets wouldn't be held so tightly by the sun's gravity (bc gravity is dependent on mass) and would orbit at a greater distance.

Now, to explain why atoms tend to decrease in size as you move ACROSS a period.
Remember that electron shielding stays the same within a period-- which is to say that valence electrons DO NOT add to the shielding effect. So, then as you move across a period, the number of protons in the nucleus increases while the electron shielding strength stays the same. This has the net effect of there being a greater "positiveness" of the nucleus as you move left to right across a period.

This increased "positiveness" causes the valence electrons to be pulled closer and closer to the nucleus as you add more and more protons. Again, by the analogy I used before, picture the sun suddenly gaining double it's mass-- the orbits of the planets would proportionally shrink, as they would be more strongly attracted by the sun's gravity.

I hope this was helpful, ad you were able to find some clarity despite my wordiness :-P
 
Last edited:
I want to test a humidity sensor with one or more saturated salt solutions. The table salt that I have on hand contains one of two anticaking agents, calcium silicate or sodium aluminosilicate. Will the presence of either of these additives (or iodine for that matter) significantly affect the equilibrium humidity? I searched and all the how-to-do-it guides did not address this question. One research paper I found reported that at 1.5% w/w calcium silicate increased the deliquescent point by...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
I'm trying to find a cheap DIY method to etch holes of various shapes through 0.3mm Aluminium sheet using 5-10% Sodium Hydroxide. The idea is to apply a resist to the Aluminium then selectively ablate it off using a diode laser cutter and then dissolve away the Aluminium using Sodium Hydroxide. By cheap I mean resists costing say £20 in small quantities. The Internet has suggested various resists to try including... Enamel paint (only survived seconds in the NaOH!) Acrylic paint (only...
Back
Top