What lessons can we learn from the Charlie Hebdo shooting?

  • News
  • Thread starter DrClaude
  • Start date
In summary: If they had blown themselves up it would be more convincingly religious.In summary, the shooting at the offices of the French satirical weekly Charlie Hebdo has left 12 people dead, including the magazine's editor in chief, Charb, and two of its cartoonists. The shootings are believed to have been religiously motivated, and authorities are investigating possible links to radical right wing groups.
  • #106
russ_watters said:
There was a married couple who assisted (only the husband was prosecuted), but that's it. Otherwise it was a totally self contained and isolated conspiracy. That's what makes it so difficult to find and stop them.

True lone wolves are pretty rare, in my estimation, for radical Islamic terrorists because they are created by the global community of radical Islam. They can be difficult to track for the opposite reason: there are so many. But that just means we need to put in a lot of effort (and we do).

Consider the Boston Marathon bombers. The actual plot was totally self contained and could almost be called "lone wolf". But their radicalization was totally out in the open/public - enough that Russia(!?) warned us twice to pay attention to the family. So they succeeded in part because we weren't quite vigilant enough and in part because the plot itself was isolated.

These guys are being grown because of a global support network -- a culture -- of hate/terrorism. It is a disturbing development in what I thought prior to 9/11 was a world that was growing more civilized.
I was responding to and reflecting on Evo's speculation about the involvement of others in the Muslim community.

In the case of McVeigh and Nichols, the did have affiliations with one or more militia groups and McVeigh spent time with a white supremacist group.
http://www.historycommons.org/timel...nizations=haitian_elite_2021_michigan_militia
Enraged by the debacle in Waco (see April 19, 1993), McVeigh and Nichols begin experimenting with explosives on James Nichols’s farm, meeting with members of the nascent Michigan Militia (see April 1994), and proposing to launch violent attacks on judges, lawyers, and police officers (see April 19, 1993 and After). McVeigh and Nichols find the militiamen too inactive for their taste. (Michigan Militia spokesmen will later claim that they ejected Nichols and his brother James from their group for their “hyperbolic language”; after the bombing, militia leader Norm Olson will say, “These people were told to leave because of that type of talk of destruction and harm and terrorism.”)
. . . .
In October, they drive to Elohim City, a white supremacist compound in eastern Oklahoma (see 1973 and After), where they meet with at least one member of the Aryan Republican Army (see 1992 - 1995).
. . . .
None of the militia or white supremacist folks notified the FBI or other authorities of any of that. At the time, the FBI and other agencies investigated any leads to various domestic terrorist or anti-government groups, no knowing who else might have been involved. The Southern Poverty Law Center and ADL together monitor more than 900 hate groups.
http://www.splcenter.org/what-we-do/hate-and-extremism

Berg, who was Jewish, gained a strong following in the early 1980s through talk radio, where his liberal views mixed with a combative and often-abrasive on-air persona. In the process, he ignited the anger of The Order, a splinter group of the Aryan Nation white nationalist movement that financed its anti-government goals with bank robberies in the Pacific Northwest — before turning to murder.
http://www.denverpost.com/firstinthepost/ci_12615628

The Order or the other 900+ hate groups do not represent the vast majority of Americans, or Christians. The Kouachi brothers and Al Qaida do not represent Islam or the vast majority of Muslims.
 
  • Like
Likes HossamCFD
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #107
Astronuc said:
Al Qaida do not represent Islam or the vast majority of Muslims.

"Vast majority" ordinarily means "much more than 50%". Say, 90% is "vast majority", 85% probably still can be called that, whereas, say, 70% is not a "vast" majority.

Unfortunately, polls do not support your statement that "vast majority" of Muslims have cardinal disagreements with extremists. In fact, it looks like about a third (!) of them mostly agree with extremists. See the attached chart.
 

Attachments

  • 10369710_812572912142346_9153545561747266219_n.jpg
    10369710_812572912142346_9153545561747266219_n.jpg
    31.3 KB · Views: 372
  • #108
Let's please keep this thread on topic
 
  • #110
Borg said:
the actual location of the two brothers.
What is the box score right now? Yesterday it was "One dead and two in custody." Last night it was "One surrendered, two on the run." Are we looking at a total of three? Or five?
 
  • #111
HossamCFD said:
...and I think it's dangerous to actively avoid making fun of Mohamed, effectively granting muslims a special status in western society.

Bystander said:
I've stated earlier in this thread that I go out of my way to avoid profaning other peoples' religions; this is going excessively out of the way to be offensive. ...

Bystander, I think that you are ... right. I've thought better of my re-posting the Charlie Hebdo cartoons here in this thread yesterday and was about to delete the image-post, though I see the authorities have, unfortunately, beat me to it.
 
  • #112
Bystander said:
What is the box score right now? Yesterday it was "One dead and two in custody." Last night it was "One surrendered, two on the run." Are we looking at a total of three? Or five?
At this point, I think that it's the 18 year old who turned himself in and the two brothers. I've been watching CNN today and they reported the following:
  • The 18 year old is a high school student and some classmates have stated that he was in class yesterday.
  • One of the brothers being hunted actually left his ID in the car.
I've also read that police had taken 7 people in for questioning. Perhaps yesterday's "two in custody" were part of that group. No idea where the one dead report came from though.
 
  • #114
russ_watters said:
You don't think pointlessly insulting is worse than funny/ironic to make a point?
No, I do. I was just making a point in response to OmCheeto's baffling comment that no one ever makes fun of Jesus Christ, only of his followers. Nikkkom then mentionned Piss Christ, which I think misses the point because it's not intended to be funny.

russ_watters said:
I will say though that some of the French cartoons don't have a point that I can see. Perhaps the language barrier is getting in the way, but some just look intentionally provocative to get attention (not unlike "Piss Christ").
I don't think it's the language barrier as much as the question of context. As with many political cartoons, they can be hard to understand if one doesn't know what prompted the cartoonist.
 
  • #115
Anyone have reliable information on the share of French police carrying firearms? Apparently those killed yesterday were unarmed. In the UK the policy is most don't, some do, but I wouldn't know the details.
 
  • #116
mheslep said:
Anyone have reliable information on the share of French police carrying firearms? Apparently those killed yesterday were unarmed. In the UK the policy is most don't, some do, but I wouldn't know the details.

A friend in Paris last week reported to me yesterday that police in La Defense (the financial district) were routinely in body armor and carrying machine pistols at the noon hour. From the fuzzy shot of the prostrate policeman, outside Charlie Hebdo, it appeared he might have been wearing body armor.
 
  • #117
mheslep said:
Anyone have reliable information on the share of French police carrying firearms? Apparently those killed yesterday were unarmed. In the UK the policy is most don't, some do, but I wouldn't know the details.
As far as I know, all French police officers are armed. One of the officers killed yesterday was assigned to protect Charb, and reports said that he did not have time to return fire. I don't know what happened with the one shot outside while the assassins were escaping.
 
  • #118
Bystander said:
What is the box score right now? Yesterday it was "One dead and two in custody." Last night it was "One surrendered, two on the run." Are we looking at a total of three? Or five?
Current situation is that one suspect has turned himself in (I heard reports that he denied any involvement), the two others are still at large and have abandonned their vehicule, and presumed to be on foot. Seven other people have been taken into custody, but have not yet been charged.
 
  • #119
Borg said:
No idea where the one dead report came from though.

Schrodinger's News

-- when you have to edit a joke, it is kind of like having to explain it...
 
  • #121
Dotini said:
Here's point of view that suggests the massacre has little to do with satire, free speech or Charlie Hebdo.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...harlie-Hebdos-satire.-What-if-were-wrong.html
"In our angry innocence, however, we persist in thinking this is somehow about cartoons."
Sort of what I was saying before. These jihadists are looking for reasons and they will create new ones. There is a higher level problem here.
 
  • Like
Likes Dotini
  • #122
russ_watters said:
Why didn't you drive to their house and shoot them? Why hasn't anyone else?
I don't think I'd look good in stripes, and neither does anyone else.

People, here in "the west", are free to say what they want, but there are repercussions. As I mentioned a few weeks ago:
OmCheeto said:
AnOldStudent said:
I didn't mean to curse anyone or anything. I am very gentle, anyone supervising me knows that well. :D
People tend not to like the truth because it either hurts or disillusions them.
I once had a friend like you. She used to complain that I was weak, because I never shared my true feelings. One day, she shared her true feelings with me, and I decided never to speak to her, ever again. The only friends she has left, are members of her coven.

Off topic response removed by mentor.The wiki entry on "terrorism" is interesting.

wiki said:
...The word "terrorism" is politically loaded and emotionally charged, and this greatly compounds the difficulty of providing a precise definition. ...

Off topic response removed by mentor.

russ_watters said:
You don't think pointlessly insulting is worse than funny/ironic to make a point?

I will say though that some of the French cartoons don't have a point that I can see. Perhaps the language barrier is getting in the way, but some just look intentionally provocative to get attention (not unlike "Piss Christ").

Sorry, but I'm just going to have to say, I agree with you here. I googled for images of Charlie Hebdo, looked at a bunch, and constantly scratched my head. The point of the images is way over my head. And apparently, we are not alone.

Please note that the date on the following is Sept 22, 2012

[ref]
This cartoon by Chappatte relates to the decision by French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo to publish a series of cartoons featuring the Prophet Muhammad. Many French newspapers have rushed to the defence of Charlie Hebdo. Others, however, accuse the paper of acting irresponsibly in the current context.The cartoons come in the wake of violence in Libya and elsewhere in the Middle East, starting last week, in response to an anti-Islamic video produced in the state of California by a US citizen.
 
Last edited:
  • #123
This point of view ascribes too much of "evil plan" to these guys. They are really not smart enough to produce a plan to ignite a civil war by provoking us into a backlash.
 
  • #124
DrClaude said:
As far as I know, all French police officers are armed.
Looks like I didn't know much! I've checked, and about 40% of municipal police officers are armed.
 
  • #125
Greg Bernhardt said:
Sort of what I was saying before. These jihadists are looking for reasons and they will create new ones. There is a higher level problem here.
No! That article is saying exactly what I was saying!

And your wife is an idiot. How can anyone not know when to put in the laundry detergent. It's obvious!
 
  • #126
DrClaude said:
Looks like I didn't know much! I've checked, and about 40% of municipal police officers are armed.

It's complicated because France has multiple police forces. There is the Police Nationale (formerly called the Surete, for those who read old novels) and the Gendarmerie Nationale. Those are the biggest, but there are others. They vary in jurisdiction (both geographic and action) and in the fraction carrying weapons.
 
  • #127
"Had he not been so narcissistic, he may still be alive"

I think there is a lot to be said for that. Indeed, here's the US position from a previous incident: "The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." We can never know for sure, but I believe had Charlie Hebdo caved after the bombing, these people would have picked another target - a lone policeman, like in 2013, or some Jewish kids like in 2012.
 
  • Like
Likes OmCheeto
  • #128
One more comment.

We are not going to be able to convince these people that it is wrong to shoot cartoonists and filmmakers. We are not going to convince them that it is wrong to whip to death rape victims. We are not going to convince them that it is wrong to capture prepubescent girls, rape them, and then sell them into slavery. We are not going to convince them to is wrong to kill people who follow a different religion. We are not going to convince them that bombing train stations and subway lines is wrong. We are not going to convince then that walking into a schoolyard and shooting an 8-year old girl in the head, execution-style, because she happens to be Jewish is wrong.

No, we're not going to convince them these actions are wrong. We might, however, be able to convince them that these actions are unsafe.
 
  • Like
Likes Enigman, OmCheeto and Bystander
  • #129
Vanadium 50 said:
One more comment.

We are not going to be able to convince these people that it is wrong to shoot cartoonists and filmmakers. We are not going to convince them that it is wrong to whip to death rape victims. We are not going to convince them that it is wrong to capture prepubescent girls, rape them, and then sell them into slavery. We are not going to convince them to is wrong to kill people who follow a different religion. We are not going to convince them that bombing train stations and subway lines is wrong. We are not going to convince then that walking into a schoolyard and shooting an 8-year old girl in the head, execution-style, because she happens to be Jewish is wrong.

No, we're not going to convince them these actions are wrong. We might, however, be able to convince them that these actions are unsafe.

What more could we possibly do to make them think it's unsafe? Clearly safety is not something these people have any regard for.
 
  • #130
DavidSnider said:
What more could we possibly do to make them think it's unsafe? Clearly safety is not something these people have any regard for.
mmmm yes and no. If they didn't care about safety and their lives then it would have been a suicide mission.
 
  • Like
Likes enosis_
  • #131
Greg Bernhardt said:
mmmm yes and no. If they didn't care about safety and their lives then it would have been a suicide mission.
This time. But many other times it is a suicide mission. One thing you will commonly hear these terrorists say is "We love death more than you love life."
 
  • Like
Likes OmCheeto
  • #132
russ_watters said:
IMO, shouting their motivation during the attack is releasing a statement.
Sort of like a death bed confession?
 
  • #133
HossamCFD said:
What a vicious and barbaric attack!

I wonder if this madness will ever end.
I don't believe it will end in our lifetimes.
 
  • Like
Likes OmCheeto
  • #134
Greg Bernhardt said:
If they didn't care about safety and their lives then it would have been a suicide mission.
It might go beyond that, though...Tacitus...
He that fights and runs away, May turn and fight another day; But he that is in battle slain, Will never rise to fight again.
 
  • #135
Well, I don't know if it is Islam itself, or the fact that most Islamic societies/countries nowadays are broken down,
with repressive governments, etc. and they cannot pull themselves out of it. Still, Salman Rushdie's last book was " Buddha, you Fat Bastard", I guess he's aiming to insult every single person in the planet.

EDIT: just a cheesy joke, the last line; hope calling an important figure a fat bastard is not that
big of a deal. You may call my hero Gauss a fat bastard, though maybe the fat part may be absurd, since he was not one, though he could be kind of nasty.
 
Last edited:
  • #136
A Sudanese political cartoonist had this to say about the Charlie Hebdo incident.

Khalid Albaih said:
When cartoons upset the 'wrong people'
Jan 8, 2015
...
Constructive role

This situation is a perpetuation of what's happening in the Middle East right now - it's far more complex than the cartoon business. For us to help, to play a constructive role, we should desist from pointing the finger at others, and we must examine what motivates these young people to turn to violence and extremism.

Freedom of speech is a powerful weapon and one I have never fully had - but for those who do have it, I wish they would stop taking it for granted.

Instead, they ought to ask the right questions - the questions that need to be asked - rather than accusatory ones that fuel the stereotypes that have originated in mainstream media.

Their work must focus on conveying the right message. They must work towards bridging the gap - and not widening it.

It's always surprising when someone from a completely alien society shares my views.
 
  • #137
It's like physics: It is generally best to understand the problem as a whole. But it is not always easy to do.
 
  • Like
Likes OmCheeto
  • #138
Police have them cornered in a building and, of course, they've taken a hostage. :oldfrown:
The two suspects in the Charlie Hebdo attack spoke to officers by phone and said they wanted to die as martyrs
 
  • #139
I'm hearing disturbing reports from an acquaintance in France.

- Around 13.00 a new shooting in Paris. A heavily armed man entered a small grocery store with around 30 people inside. Started to shoot with automatic weapon.
- Shooter still in store with several hostages
- Jewish grocery store, shooter inside with several, perhaps 5 hostages.
- He's believed to be the same man who shot the policewoman yesterday.
- Apparently the supermarket gunman in Paris is demanding that the siege where the Kouachi brothers are pinned down is lifted, otherwise he will continue to hold hostages in Paris.

Edit: Now an unconfirmed report he has surrendered. Obviously, this is all still breaking and confused. So far I see no reports in western media.

Edit 2: Here it is.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-30740115#sa-ns_mchannel=rss&ns_source=PublicRSS20-sa

Edit 3: British spy boss says expect more and bigger attacks very soon.

http://news.yahoo.com/britains-mi5-chief-warns-al-qaeda-syria-planning-220625665.html
 
Last edited:
  • #140
I'm watching CNN. There are shootings and presumed flash bangs going off at both hostage locations.
 

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
42
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
3
Replies
73
Views
5K
  • General Discussion
3
Replies
77
Views
12K
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
692
  • General Discussion
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • General Discussion
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top