Should EE/CSE students take the FE exam?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Llama77
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether Electrical and Computer Engineering (EE/CSE) students should take the Fundamentals of Engineering (FE) exam. While some professors and advisers suggest that the FE and Professional Engineer (PE) certifications are unnecessary for certain fields, particularly in Silicon Valley R&D, employers often value the FE exam as a sign of competency. The PE certification is seen as more relevant for consulting roles in civil and mechanical engineering, where safety standards are critical. Some participants argue that practical skills are lacking in recent graduates, making the FE exam a beneficial review of undergraduate knowledge. Ultimately, taking the FE exam is not essential for all engineering paths, but it can enhance job prospects in specific sectors.
Llama77
Messages
113
Reaction score
0
Im a computer and Electrical engineering student at the University at Buffalo, I was told by a few professors as well as a career adviser that people in my to-be field don't need the FE and then the PE,

Is this true?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
What's an FE? I think PE is Professional Engineer certification?
 
FE (Fundamentals of Engineering) is the exam that you usually take before your PE.

Employers hiring recent engineering graduates often look to see if the applicant has successfully passed the FE exam.
I did a search and found this
http://www.engineeringlicense.com/feexam/
The paragraph I've quoted sounds weird to me as I haven't been encouraged to take the FE exam by my professors. And since you are unaware of the FE exam, berkeman, then you guys probably don't look for this sort of thing down at Echelon right?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FE_exam
 
ranger said:
FE (Fundamentals of Engineering) is the exam that you usually take before your PE.


I did a search and found this
http://www.engineeringlicense.com/feexam/
The paragraph I've quoted sounds weird to me as I haven't been encouraged to take the FE exam by my professors. And since you are unaware of the FE exam, berkeman, then you guys probably don't look for this sort of thing down at Echelon right?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FE_exam

Thanks for the info, ranger. Yeah, I don't know if my experience is typical or not, so please, nobody take what I'm about to say as gospel, okay? Your mileage may vary, and you need to do your research for your particular geographic region and specialty and job opportunities.

No, a PE or FE means nothing that I know of for general Silicon Valley R&D employment. I think the PE cert is aimed more at independent consultants with particular avenues of employment (like government contracts?). But after working in industry for about 7-8 years, I consulted on my own in Silicon Valley for over 5 years, and a PE cert never once came up. The work I did was highly technical and startup oriented, for the most part, so that may be one component. But at least once my work was under part of the government umbrella, and I did have some conversations with LLNL about one of my patents, and a PE cert never came up in either case. (That potential contract/license did not go anywhere however.)

I would think that the PE cert might be important if you were anticipating doing consulting work in the civil engineering or mechanical engineering fields, where physical structures might cause injury if they were not designed to existing standards. The EE and CE/ME fields are a bit different in this vein... (in a number of ways)
 
It really depends on the company.
A lot of Post Graduate students do not have any practicle skills therefore companies who rely on people actually building stuff will often look at the more basic and practically orientated qualification.

I took a more vocational training route prior to university due to being slightly dyslexic and also hating formal education. When I got to University I was amazed how how little practical knowledge was required to become a post grad engineer. Since then the situation in the UK has got worse with some physics graduates coming to me without even the fundamentals of building electrical circuits. We are now sending graduates off on a basic mechanical/electrical assembly course when they arrive.

Of course I have no idea what FE entails so these comments may not be relevant.
 
I'm taking the FE in April. I'm a senior EE and I've been told that it's good for jobs in consulting firms, etc. It is by no means necessary to land a job, but I don't see a good reason for not taking it. It will force you to review everything from your undergraduate career.
 
While I was rolling out a shielded cable, a though came to my mind - what happens to the current flow in the cable if there came a short between the wire and the shield in both ends of the cable? For simplicity, lets assume a 1-wire copper wire wrapped in an aluminum shield. The wire and the shield has the same cross section area. There are insulating material between them, and in both ends there is a short between them. My first thought, the total resistance of the cable would be reduced...
Hey guys. I have a question related to electricity and alternating current. Say an alien fictional society developed electricity, and settled on a standard like 73V AC current at 46 Hz. How would appliances be designed, and what impact would the lower frequency and voltage have on transformers, wiring, TVs, computers, LEDs, motors, and heating, assuming the laws of physics and technology are the same as on Earth?
I used to be an HVAC technician. One time I had a service call in which there was no power to the thermostat. The thermostat did not have power because the fuse in the air handler was blown. The fuse in the air handler was blown because there was a low voltage short. The rubber coating on one of the thermostat wires was chewed off by a rodent. The exposed metal in the thermostat wire was touching the metal cabinet of the air handler. This was a low voltage short. This low voltage...
Back
Top