Should I Learn Trigonometry or Geometry After Intermediate Algebra?

AI Thread Summary
For those looking to learn second-year algebra, several free online resources are recommended, including searches for "hefferon" or "hefferin" linked to "Lamar," which may yield useful Intermediate Algebra materials. Additionally, the website Purplemath is suggested as a helpful resource. After mastering second-year algebra, students typically progress to either Geometry or Trigonometry. The standard academic sequence includes Elementary Algebra, Intermediate Algebra, Geometry, and then Trigonometry. While Geometry is often a prerequisite for Trigonometry, some students may be able to bypass it and proceed directly to Pre-Calculus, though this is generally not advisable for everyone due to the advanced content involved.
Stratosphere
Messages
373
Reaction score
0
Does any have some good online free books so I could learn the second year of algebra.(I've only learned the first year) I also would want to know if after I learn the second year of algebra I should learn trig or geometry.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone?
 
Try a web search for "hefferon" or "hefferin", associated with a name, "Lamar" and you might find some instructive files for Intermediate Algebra. Also check http://www.purplemath.com (or is it .org ?)
Still, a 20-year-old book would be better.

You can study Geometry or Trigonometry after Intermediate Algebra. The typical college sequence is like this:
Elementary Algebra, Intermediate Algebra, Geometry, Trigonometry,..
Geometry would often be listed as one of the prerequisites for Trigonometry but this is not absolutely necessary for everyone - it depends on the capabilities of the student. Some students may be able to skip Trigonometry and go directly to Pre-Calculus but this may also not be a good idea for most students (Pre-Calculus is a combination course of somewhat more advanced arithmetic-algebra than "Intermediate", and Trigonometry).
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
46
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
71
Views
731
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top