Should I Start Undergraduate Research Next Quarter or Wait Until Spring?

  • Thread starter Thread starter proton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Research
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the timing of undergraduate research in relation to coursework and future applications for Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REUs). The participant is currently a junior in a trimester system, planning to take upper-division physics and math courses while considering postponing research until spring. There is a consensus that starting research sooner is beneficial, as it allows more time to learn necessary background material and produce meaningful results. Engaging in research early can also lead to stronger letters of recommendation for REU applications. The conversation emphasizes the importance of not delaying involvement in research, as opportunities to learn and contribute are always present, regardless of current academic standing.
proton
Messages
349
Reaction score
0
My school runs on the trimester system. Next quarter, I will start my upper-div physics by taking classical mechanics. Along w/that I'll take a lower-div physics lab, and upper-div DEs. I want to also take abstract algebra, since I've found my 1st quarter of upper-div math to be more interesting than my current physics classes. I want to wait to do undergrad research until spring of next year, but I'll be behind everyone else, right? Also, I want to apply to REUs for next summer, so doing research for a prof will give a good letter of rec to apply to REUs, right? Therefore, would it be a bad idea to not do research next quarter (winter) but postpone it to spring?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What year are you in, now?
 
The sooner, the better, I would think. Even if you have to post-pone taking a class. You know the class you put off now will still be offered later. Getting a prof to give you something to do isn't that easy.
 
Definitely the sooner the better. Once you get a research position, it takes a lot of time learning background material before you'll actually be able to get anything done. You don't want to run out of time before being able to produce something useful.
 
i'm currently a junior (i plan on graduating in my 5th year). That sucks that research is better the sooner.
 
proton said:
i'm currently a junior (i plan on graduating in my 5th year). That sucks that research is better the sooner.

Well then, it sounds like the best time for you to start trying hard to get involved in research is...right now.

Really, that goes for most people that are interested in research. Why wait? Yeah, there's limits on what you can do at a given stage, but there's always something worth doing or learning.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Back
Top